Literature DB >> 11014823

Nonrandom segregation of the mouse univalent X chromosome: evidence of spindle-mediated meiotic drive.

R LeMaire-Adkins1, P A Hunt.   

Abstract

A fundamental principle of Mendelian inheritance is random segregation of alleles to progeny; however, examples of distorted transmission either of specific alleles or of whole chromosomes have been described in a variety of species. In humans and mice, a distortion in chromosome transmission is often associated with a chromosome abnormality. One such example is the fertile XO female mouse. A transmission distortion effect that results in an excess of XX over XO daughters among the progeny of XO females has been recognized for nearly four decades. Utilizing contemporary methodology that combines immunofluorescence, FISH, and three-dimensional confocal microscopy, we have readdressed the meiotic segregation behavior of the single X chromosome in oocytes from XO females produced on two different inbred backgrounds. Our studies demonstrate that segregation of the univalent X chromosome at the first meiotic division is nonrandom, with preferential retention of the X chromosome in the oocyte in approximately 60% of cells. We propose that this deviation from Mendelian expectations is facilitated by a spindle-mediated mechanism. This mechanism, which appears to be a general feature of the female meiotic process, has implications for the frequency of nondisjunction in our species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014823      PMCID: PMC1461275     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Cytogenetic analysis of oocytes and early preimplantation embryos from XO mice.

Authors:  F W Luthardt
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology.

Authors:  T Hassold; M Abruzzo; K Adkins; D Griffin; M Merrill; E Millie; D Saker; J Shen; M Zaragoza
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Chromosomal drive and the evolution of meiotic nondisjunction and trisomy in humans.

Authors:  T Day; P D Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effect of sperm genotype on chromatid segregation in female mice heterozygous for aberrant chromosome 1.

Authors:  S I Agulnik; I D Sabantsev; A O Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  X-chromosome segregation, maternal age and aneuploidy in the XO mouse.

Authors:  J D Brook
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Genetic variation in rates of nondisjunction: association of two naturally occurring polymorphisms in the chromokinesin nod with increased rates of nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E Zwick; J L Salstrom; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Meiotic drive on aberrant chromosome 1 in the mouse is determined by a linked distorter.

Authors:  S I Agulnik; I D Sabantsev; G V Orlova; A O Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Segregation distortion of X-linked marker genes in interspecific crosses between Mus musculus and M. spretus.

Authors:  F G Biddle
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 10.  Chromatid cohesion during mitosis: lessons from meiosis.

Authors:  C L Rieder; R Cole
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  27 in total

1.  Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Paul S Burgoyne; Edward P Evans; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  B chromosomes are more frequent in mammals with acrocentric karyotypes: support for the theory of centromeric drive.

Authors:  Brian G Palestis; Austin Burt; R Neil Jones; Robert Trivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Back to the roots: segregation of univalent sex chromosomes in meiosis.

Authors:  Gunar Fabig; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Analysis of case-parent trios for imprinting effect using a loglinear model with adjustment for sex-of-parent-specific transmission ratio distortion.

Authors:  Lam Opal Huang; Claire Infante-Rivard; Aurélie Labbe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Spindle assembly in the oocytes of mouse and Drosophila--similar solutions to a problem.

Authors:  Susan Doubilet; Kim S McKim
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Maternal transmission ratio distortion at the mouse Om locus results from meiotic drive at the second meiotic division.

Authors:  Guangming Wu; Lanping Hao; Zhiming Han; Shaorong Gao; Keith E Latham; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  High progesterone during avian meiosis biases sex ratios toward females.

Authors:  Stephanie M Correa; Elizabeth Adkins-Regan; Patricia A Johnson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome.

Authors:  Sebastian Zöllner; Xiaoquan Wen; Neil A Hanchard; Mark A Herbert; Carole Ober; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Transmission ratio distortion: review of concept and implications for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Lam Opal Huang; Aurélie Labbe; Claire Infante-Rivard
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.