Literature DB >> 18626686

Characterizing the relative contributions of large vessels to total ocean noise fields: a case study using the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.

Leila Hatch1, Christopher Clark, Richard Merrick, Sofie Van Parijs, Dimitri Ponirakis, Kurt Schwehr, Michael Thompson, David Wiley.   

Abstract

In 2006, we used the U.S. Coast Guard's Automatic Identification System (AIS) to describe patterns of large commercial ship traffic within a U.S. National Marine Sanctuary located off the coast of Massachusetts. We found that 541 large commercial vessels transited the greater sanctuary 3413 times during the year. Cargo ships, tankers, and tug/tows constituted 78% of the vessels and 82% of the total transits. Cargo ships, tankers, and cruise ships predominantly used the designated Boston Traffic Separation Scheme, while tug/tow traffic was concentrated in the western and northern portions of the sanctuary. We combined AIS data with low-frequency acoustic data from an array of nine autonomous recording units analyzed for 2 months in 2006. Analysis of received sound levels (10-1000 Hz, root-mean-square pressure re 1 microPa +/- SE) averaged 119.5 +/- 0.3 dB at high-traffic locations. High-traffic locations experienced double the acoustic power of less trafficked locations for the majority of the time period analyzed. Average source level estimates (71-141 Hz, root-mean-square pressure re 1 microPa +/- SE) for individual vessels ranged from 158 +/- 2 dB (research vessel) to 186 +/- 2 dB (oil tanker). Tankers were estimated to contribute 2 times more acoustic power to the region than cargo ships, and more than 100 times more than research vessels. Our results indicate that noise produced by large commercial vessels was at levels and within frequencies that warrant concern among managers regarding the ability of endangered whales to maintain acoustic contact within greater sanctuary waters.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626686     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9169-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California.

Authors:  Mark A McDonald; John A Hildebrand; Sean M Wiggins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic detection of North Atlantic right whale contact calls using the generalized likelihood ratio test.

Authors:  Ildar R Urazghildiiev; Christopher W Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Orientation by means of long range acoustic signaling in baleen whales.

Authors:  R Payne; D Webb
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1971-12-03       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Sound production by North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in surface active groups.

Authors:  Susan E Parks; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Zones of impact around icebreakers affecting beluga whales in the Beaufort Sea.

Authors:  C Erbe; D M Farmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking in three pinnipeds: underwater, low-frequency critical ratios.

Authors:  B L Southall; R J Schusterman; D Kastak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  Evidence that ship noise increases stress in right whales.

Authors:  Rosalind M Rolland; Susan E Parks; Kathleen E Hunt; Manuel Castellote; Peter J Corkeron; Douglas P Nowacek; Samuel K Wasser; Scott D Kraus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Loudness-dependent behavioral responses and habituation to sound by the longfin squid (Doryteuthis pealeii).

Authors:  T Aran Mooney; Julia E Samson; Andrea D Schlunk; Samantha Zacarias
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Individual right whales call louder in increased environmental noise.

Authors:  Susan E Parks; Mark Johnson; Douglas Nowacek; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Evidence for ship noise impacts on humpback whale foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Hannah B Blair; Nathan D Merchant; Ari S Friedlaender; David N Wiley; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Changes in humpback whale song occurrence in response to an acoustic source 200 km away.

Authors:  Denise Risch; Peter J Corkeron; William T Ellison; Sofie M Van Parijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Method for the simplistic modelling of the acoustic footprint of the vessels in the shallow marine area.

Authors:  Donatas Bagočius; Aleksas Narščius
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-08-28

7.  Identifying modeled ship noise hotspots for marine mammals of Canada's Pacific region.

Authors:  Christine Erbe; Rob Williams; Doug Sandilands; Erin Ashe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ecosystem scale acoustic sensing reveals humpback whale behavior synchronous with herring spawning processes and re-evaluation finds no effect of sonar on humpback song occurrence in the Gulf of Maine in fall 2006.

Authors:  Zheng Gong; Ankita D Jain; Duong Tran; Dong Hoon Yi; Fan Wu; Alexander Zorn; Purnima Ratilal; Nicholas C Makris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Exploring spatial and temporal trends in the soundscape of an ecologically significant embayment.

Authors:  R L Putland; R Constantine; C A Radford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Underwater sound from vessel traffic reduces the effective communication range in Atlantic cod and haddock.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Sofie M Van Parijs; Leila T Hatch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.