Literature DB >> 12775791

Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles.

J Wardle1, A Steptoe.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: s: The factors underlying socioeconomic status differences in smoking, leisure time physical activity, and dietary choice are poorly understood. This study investigated attitudes and beliefs that might underlie behavioural choices, including health locus of control, future salience, subjective life expectancy, and health consciousness, in a nationally representative sample.
DESIGN: Data were collected as part of the monthly Omnibus survey of the Office of National Statistics in Britain. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified, probability sample of 2728 households was selected by random sampling of addresses. One adult from each household was interviewed. MAIN
RESULTS: Higher SES respondents were less likely to smoke and more likely to exercise and eat fruit and vegetables daily. Lower SES was associated with less health consciousness (thinking about things to do to keep healthy), stronger beliefs in the influence of chance on health, less thinking about the future, and lower life expectancies. These attitudinal factors were in turn associated with unhealthy behavioural choices, independently of age, sex, and self rated health.
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic differences in healthy lifestyles are associated with differences in attitudes to health that may themselves arise through variations in life opportunities and exposure to material hardship and ill health over the life course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775791      PMCID: PMC1732468          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.6.440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  14 in total

1.  Locus of control and health behaviour revisited: a multivariate analysis of young adults from 18 countries.

Authors:  A Steptoe; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  The Black Report and beyond: what are the issues?

Authors:  S Macintyre
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Socioeconomic status and weight control practices in British adults.

Authors:  J Wardle; J Griffith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales.

Authors:  K A Wallston; B S Wallston; R DeVellis
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1978

Review 5.  Whose fault is it? People's own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities.

Authors:  M Blaxter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse.

Authors:  J W Lynch; G A Kaplan; J T Salonen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Social class and preventive health behaviour: a British example.

Authors:  R Pill; T J Peters; M R Robling
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Socioeconomic differences in weight gain and determinants and consequences of coronary risk factors.

Authors:  P T Martikainen; M G Marmot
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  J Wardle; S Sutton; S Williamson; T Taylor; K McCaffery; J Cuzick; A Hart; W Atkin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England.

Authors:  K Parmenter; J Waller; J Wardle
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2000-04
View more
  143 in total

1.  Metabolic syndrome and socioeconomic status in France: The French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS, 2006-2007).

Authors:  M Vernay; B Salanave; C de Peretti; C Druet; A Malon; V Deschamps; S Hercberg; K Castetbon
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Socioeconomic position and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the ELSA study.

Authors:  Panayotes Demakakos; Michael Marmot; Andrew Steptoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Behavior matters.

Authors:  Edwin B Fisher; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Russell E Glasgow; Debra Haire-Joshu; Laura L Hayman; Robert M Kaplan; Marilyn S Nanney; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Social inequality and smoking in young Swiss men: intergenerational transmission of cultural capital and health orientation.

Authors:  Dominik Schori; Karen Hofmann; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Time perspective and exercise, obesity, and smoking: moderation of associations by age.

Authors:  Lori C Guthrie; Stephen C Butler; Kristen Lessl; Onyinyechukwu Ochi; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013-11-07

6.  Smoking and chronic back pain: analyses of the German Telephone Health Survey 2003.

Authors:  Monique Zimmermann-Stenzel; Julia Mannuss; Sven Schneider; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples.

Authors:  Rachel A Crockett; John Weinman; Matthew Hankins; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-03

8.  Pathways Linking Childhood SES and Adult Health Behaviors and Psychological Resources in Black and White Men.

Authors:  Jennifer Morozink Boylan; Jenny M Cundiff; Karen P Jakubowski; Dustin A Pardini; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2018-11-12

9.  Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

Authors:  Eleanor Mann; A Toby Prevost; Simon Griffin; Ian Kellar; Stephen Sutton; Michael Parker; Simon Sanderson; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.