Literature DB >> 17886235

Sample size evaluation for a multiply matched case-control study using the score test from a conditional logistic (discrete Cox PH) regression model.

John M Lachin1.   

Abstract

The conditional logistic regression model (Biometrics 1982; 38:661-672) provides a convenient method for the assessment of qualitative or quantitative covariate effects on risk in a study with matched sets, each containing a possibly different number of cases and controls. The conditional logistic likelihood is identical to the stratified Cox proportional hazards model likelihood, with an adjustment for ties (J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1972; 34:187-220). This likelihood also applies to a nested case-control study with multiply matched cases and controls, selected from those at risk at selected event times. Herein the distribution of the score test for the effect of a covariate in the model is used to derive simple equations to describe the power of the test to detect a coefficient theta (log odds ratio or log hazard ratio) or the number of cases (or matched sets) and controls required to provide a desired level of power. Additional expressions are derived for a quantitative covariate as a function of the difference in the assumed mean covariate values among cases and controls and for a qualitative covariate in terms of the difference in the probabilities of exposure for cases and controls. Examples are presented for a nested case-control study and a multiply matched case-control study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17886235      PMCID: PMC3626499          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs.

Authors:  T M Therneau; H Li
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Sample-size calculations for the Cox proportional hazards regression model with nonbinary covariates.

Authors:  F Y Hsieh; P W Lavori
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

3.  Comparative impact of multiple biomarkers and N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in the context of conventional risk factors for the prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study.

Authors:  Stefan Blankenberg; Matthew J McQueen; Marek Smieja; Janice Pogue; Cynthia Balion; Eva Lonn; Hans J Rupprecht; Christoph Bickel; Laurence Tiret; Francois Cambien; Hertzel Gerstein; Thomas Münzel; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Patricia A Cleary; Jye-Yu C Backlund; Saul M Genuth; John M Lachin; Trevor J Orchard; Philip Raskin; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A score test for determining sample size in matched case-control studies with categorical exposure.

Authors:  Samiran Sinha; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Estimation of sample sizes in case-control studies with multiple controls per case: dichotomous data.

Authors:  K J Lui
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Individual matching with multiple controls in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Choosing the number of controls in a matched case-control study, some sample size, power and efficiency considerations.

Authors:  J M Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model.

Authors:  D A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Covariance adjustment of relative-risk estimates in matched studies.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  20 in total

1.  A case-control study to examine the association between breastfeeding during late pregnancy and risk of a small-for-gestational-age birth in Lima, Peru.

Authors:  Rossina G Pareja; Grace S Marquis; Mary E Penny; Philip M Dixon
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Propositional density and cognitive function in later life: findings from the Precursors Study.

Authors:  Michal Engelman; Emily M Agree; Lucy A Meoni; Michael J Klag
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  A1C and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Danielle C Colayco; Fang Niu; Jeffrey S McCombs; T Craig Cheetham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Oral sucrose administration to reduce pain response during immunization in 16-19-month infants: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Gonca Yilmaz; Nilgun Caylan; Melek Oguz; Can Demir Karacan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Vitamin D at the onset of type 1 diabetes in Italian children.

Authors:  Bruna Franchi; Michele Piazza; Marco Sandri; Federica Mazzei; Claudio Maffeis; Attilio Loris Boner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Snowball Sampling Study Design for Serosurveys Early in Disease Outbreaks.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Xueting Qiu; William P Hanage
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.363

7.  Biomarker discovery study design for type 1 diabetes in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study.

Authors:  Hye-Seung Lee; Brant R Burkhardt; Wendy McLeod; Susan Smith; Chris Eberhard; Kristian Lynch; David Hadley; Marian Rewers; Olli Simell; Jin-Xiong She; Bill Hagopian; Ake Lernmark; Beena Akolkar; Anette G Ziegler; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.128

8.  Relationship of glycated albumin to blood glucose and HbA1c values and to retinopathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular outcomes in the DCCT/EDIC study.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Paula McGee; Michael W Steffes; John M Lachin
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  A novel classifier based on three preoperative tumor markers predicting the cancer-specific survival of gastric cancer (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4).

Authors:  Jing Guo; Shangxiang Chen; Shun Li; Xiaowei Sun; Wei Li; Zhiwei Zhou; Yingbo Chen; Dazhi Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-14

10.  Low levels of mannan-binding lectin or ficolins are not associated with an increased risk of cytomegalovirus disease in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Adrian Egli; Juliane Schäfer; Michael Osthoff; Steffen Thiel; Christina Mikkelsen; Andri Rauch; Hans H Hirsch; Heiner C Bucher; James Young; Jens C Jensenius; Manuel Battegay; Marten Trendelenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.