Literature DB >> 10993994

Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up.

S Chaturvedi1, R Aggarwal, A Murugappan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that neurologic complications following carotid endarterectomy (CE) are underestimated if patients are not examined by neurologists after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To review the morbidity and mortality in a cohort of patients examined before and after CE in a neurology and stroke clinic.
METHODS: This was a prospective case series from an academic medical center; 44 patients were referred for CE during the period June 1995 to April 1999. Mean age was 64.3 years; 70.5% were referred for symptomatic stenosis and 29.5% were asymptomatic. Three neurosurgeons and two vascular surgeons operated on the patients.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 4.5% and the 30-day stroke or death rate was 11.4%. One patient had a TIA due to thrombus formation at the operative site and a second patient had an asymptomatic intimal flap.
CONCLUSIONS: With prospective follow-up by neurologists, the CE complication rate in an academic medical center was significantly higher than the rates reported in controlled clinical trials. The generalizability of data from CE clinical trials is limited and local audits are necessary to better establish the risk/benefit ratio for individual hospitals and surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10993994     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  8 in total

1.  Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; A A Rabinstein; D M Nasr; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Francesco Liistro; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Interventional neuroradiology.

Authors:  S Renowden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Management of carotid artery stenosis: comparing endarterectomy and stenting.

Authors:  Ricardo A Hanel; Andrew R Xavier; Jawad F Kirmani; Abutaher M Yahia; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Lesion load in unprotected carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; P Papanagiotou; C Roth; K Fassbender; K Karp; C Krick; H Schieber; M Müller; A Haass; W Reith
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Carotid artery stenting, endarterectomy, or medical treatment alone: the debate is not over.

Authors:  Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Hamidreza Goodarzynejad
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2011-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.