INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of new ischemic lesions found on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in nonselected patients after unprotected carotid artery stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a nonrandomized cohort of 197 patients presenting with carotid occlusive disease who underwent unprotected carotid artery stent placement between 2003 and 2006. Mean degree of stenosis was 86.94% +/- 9.72. In all patients, DWI was obtained before and 24 h after stent placement. New lesions were evaluated according to size and location. RESULTS: In 59 of 197 patients (29.9%), new ischemic lesions were found on DWI in the vessel dependent area. In 23 of 197 patients (11.7%), new ischemic lesions were found in the vessel independent area. Combined stroke/death rate was 3.63%. CONCLUSION: In our series of unprotected carotid angioplasty with stent, we found new DWI lesions in 34% of the patients. Further studies should now show in how far protection devices can reduce these lesions.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of new ischemic lesions found on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in nonselected patients after unprotected carotid artery stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a nonrandomized cohort of 197 patients presenting with carotid occlusive disease who underwent unprotected carotid artery stent placement between 2003 and 2006. Mean degree of stenosis was 86.94% +/- 9.72. In all patients, DWI was obtained before and 24 h after stent placement. New lesions were evaluated according to size and location. RESULTS: In 59 of 197 patients (29.9%), new ischemic lesions were found on DWI in the vessel dependent area. In 23 of 197 patients (11.7%), new ischemic lesions were found in the vessel independent area. Combined stroke/death rate was 3.63%. CONCLUSION: In our series of unprotected carotid angioplasty with stent, we found new DWI lesions in 34% of the patients. Further studies should now show in how far protection devices can reduce these lesions.
Authors: M Rosenkranz; J Fiehler; W Niesen; C Waiblinger; B Eckert; O Wittkugel; T Kucinski; J Röther; H Zeumer; C Weiller; U Sliwka Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreas Kastrup; Klaus Gröschel; Hilmar Krapf; Bernhard R Brehm; Johannes Dichgans; Jörg B Schulz Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Niels D Prins; Tom den Heijer; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martin Bendszus; Martin Koltzenburg; Andreas J Bartsch; Roland Goldbrunner; Thomas Günthner-Lengsfeld; Franz X Weilbach; Klaus Roosen; Klaus V Toyka; László Solymosi Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bernhard Reimers; Michael Schlüter; Fausto Castriota; Thilo Tübler; Nicola Corvaja; Carlo Cernetti; Raffaella Manetti; Amedeo Picciolo; Francesco Liistro; Carlo Di Mario; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Antonio Colombo Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Iris Quasar Grunwald; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Wolfgang Reith; Martin Backens; Tilman Supprian; Maria Politi; Verena Vedder; K Zercher; B Muscalla; Anton Haass; Christoph M Krick Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Heiko Koerner; Christian Derveaux; Maria Alexandrou; Stefan Graeber; Christian Roth; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Hermann Eichler; Wolfgang Reith Journal: Stroke Res Treat Date: 2012-02-28