Literature DB >> 10986063

How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues.

S B Detmar1, N K Aaronson, L D Wever, M Muller, J H Schornagel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated (1) the attitudes of cancer patients toward discussing health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) issues; (2) the association between such attitudes and patients' characteristics; and (3) oncologists' attitudes and self-reported behavior regarding these same issues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients receiving palliative chemotherapy and ten physicians were asked to complete a series of questionnaires.
RESULTS: Almost all patients wanted to discuss their physical symptoms and physical functioning and were also willing to address their emotional functioning and daily activities. However, 25% of the patients were only willing to discuss these latter two issues at the initiative of their physician. Patients varied most in their willingness to discuss their family and social life, with 20% reporting no interest in discussing these issues at all. Female patients were more reluctant to discuss various HRQL issues than male patients. Older and less well-educated patients were more likely to prefer that their physician initiate discussion of HRQL issues. All physicians considered it to be primarily their task to discuss the physical aspects of their patients' health, whereas four physicians indicated that discussion of psychosocial issues was a task to be shared with other health care providers. All physicians indicated that they generally defer to their patients in initiating discussion of psychosocial issues.
CONCLUSION: Although both patients and oncologists seem willing to discuss a wide range of HRQL issues, communication regarding psychosocial issues may be hampered by competing expectations as to who should take the lead in initiating such discussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986063     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  69 in total

1.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Oncologists' assessments of lung cancer patient and family disagreements regarding treatment decision making.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Lindsey Dorflinger; Amma Agyemang; Sherman Baker; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Concept-elicitation phase for the development of the pediatric patient-reported outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Bryce B Reeve; Justin N Baker; Christa E Martens; Molly McFatrich; Catriona Mowbray; Diana Palma; Lillian Sung; Deborah Tomlinson; Janice Withycombe; Pamela Hinds
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jae-Hyun Park; Eun-Jung Shim; Myung-Il Hahm; Jong-Hyock Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  How much do doctors use quality of life information in primary care? Testing the trans-theoretical model of behaviour change.

Authors:  Suzanne M Skevington; Rachel Day; Alison Chisholm; Paul Trueman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  [The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].

Authors:  Lisa M Wintner; Johannes M Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Monika Sztankay; Anne Oberguggenberger; Eva-Maria Gamper; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  The effects of response bias on self-reported quality of life among childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tara E O'Leary; Lisa Diller; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality of life in higher resolution: the next generation of comparative effectiveness research in malignant hematology.

Authors:  Thomas W LeBlanc; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Caring for the brain tumor patient: family caregiver burden and unmet needs.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Mable B Kinzie; Elana Farace
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Communication in end-stage cancer: review of the literature and future research.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Trice; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.