BACKGROUND: Several studies of long-term adjustment in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) report very positive outcomes, while other studies find significant adjustment problems. These inconsistencies have prompted some investigators to suggest survivors may be biased responders, prone to underreporting on self-report measures. This study tested the hypothesis that CCS are elevated on self-deception response bias (SDRB), and that SDRB is associated with higher ratings of quality-of-life (QOL). METHODS: One hundred and seven adult (mean age = 31.85) survivors of childhood cancers completed a demographic questionnaire, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), and Self-Deception Enhancement scale (SDE), an SDRB measure. RESULTS: Survivors' QOL scores were similar to normative groups, but they evidenced much higher levels of response bias. SDE scores were significantly correlated with the FACT-G, and SF-12 Mental Health (but not Physical Health) scores even after accounting for demographic and treatment-related variables. CONCLUSIONS: CCS show a biased response style, indicating a systematic tendency to deny difficulties on QOL measures. This may complicate QOL studies by inflating survivors' reports of their socio-emotional functioning. Understanding how response bias develops may help us learn more about cancer survivors' adaptation to illness, and the effects of the illness experience on their perceptions of QOL.
BACKGROUND: Several studies of long-term adjustment in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) report very positive outcomes, while other studies find significant adjustment problems. These inconsistencies have prompted some investigators to suggest survivors may be biased responders, prone to underreporting on self-report measures. This study tested the hypothesis that CCS are elevated on self-deception response bias (SDRB), and that SDRB is associated with higher ratings of quality-of-life (QOL). METHODS: One hundred and seven adult (mean age = 31.85) survivors of childhood cancers completed a demographic questionnaire, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), and Self-Deception Enhancement scale (SDE), an SDRB measure. RESULTS: Survivors' QOL scores were similar to normative groups, but they evidenced much higher levels of response bias. SDE scores were significantly correlated with the FACT-G, and SF-12 Mental Health (but not Physical Health) scores even after accounting for demographic and treatment-related variables. CONCLUSIONS: CCS show a biased response style, indicating a systematic tendency to deny difficulties on QOL measures. This may complicate QOL studies by inflating survivors' reports of their socio-emotional functioning. Understanding how response bias develops may help us learn more about cancer survivors' adaptation to illness, and the effects of the illness experience on their perceptions of QOL.
Authors: L K Zeltzer; E Chen; R Weiss; M D Guo; L L Robison; A T Meadows; J L Mills; H S Nicholson; J Byrne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Hobbie; Hegang Chen; James G Gurney; Mark Yeazel; Christopher J Recklitis; Neyssa Marina; Leslie R Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Norma Mammone D'Agostino; Kim Edelstein; Nan Zhang; Christopher J Recklitis; Tara M Brinkman; Deokumar Srivastava; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Giselle K Perez; Anne C Kirchhoff; Christopher Recklitis; Kevin R Krull; Karen A Kuhlthau; Paul C Nathan; Julia Rabin; Gregory T Armstrong; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Elyse R Park Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-04-15 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Chandylen L Nightingale; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Barbara A Curbow; Bradley J Zebrack; Kevin R Krull; I-Chan Huang Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Janine Piscione; Wendy Barden; Janie Barry; Alexandra Malkin; Trisha Roy; Tyki Sueyoshi; Karen Mazil; Steven Salomon; Firas Dandachli; Anthony Griffin; Hugo Saint-Yves; Pina Giuliano; Abha Gupta; Peter Ferguson; Katrin Scheinemann; Michelle Ghert; Robert E Turcotte; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Joel Werier; Caron Strahlendorf; Marc Isler; Sophie Mottard; Samina Afzal; Megan E Anderson; Sevan Hopyan Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Victoria W Willard; James L Klosky; Chenghong Li; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Tara M Brinkman; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Sean Phipps Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robyn A Howarth; Jason M Ashford; Thomas E Merchant; Robert J Ogg; Victor Santana; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Heather M Conklin Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 2.892