Literature DB >> 21212191

Eye movements and imitation learning: intentional disruption of expectation.

Jessica Maryott1, Abigail Noyce, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

Over repeated viewings of motion along a quasi-random path, ability to reproduce that path from memory improves. To assess the role of expectations and sequence context on such learning, subjects eye movements were measured while trajectories were viewed for subsequent reproduction. As a sequence of motions was repeated, subjects' eye movements became anticipatory, leading the stimulus' motions. To investigate how prediction errors affected eye movements and imitation learning, we injected an occasional deviant motion into a well-learned stimulus sequence, violating subjects' expectation about the motion that would be seen. This unexpected direction of motion in the stimulus sequence did not impair reproduction of the sequence. The externally induced prediction errors promoted one-shot learning: During the very next stimulus presentation, their eye movements showed that subjects now expected the new sequence item to reappear. A second experiment showed that an associative mismatch can facilitate accurate reproduction of an unexpected stimulus. After a deviant sequence item was presented, imitation accuracy for sequences that contained the deviant direction of motion was reduced relative to sequences that restored the original direction of motions. These findings demonstrate that in the context of a familiar sequence, unexpected events can play an important role in learning the sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212191      PMCID: PMC3304544          DOI: 10.1167/11.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators.

Authors:  F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer; M Eimer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

2.  The role of expectancy and volition in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  G R Barnes; A M Schmid; C B Jarrett
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Neural correlates of sequence encoding in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neuronal bases of directional expectation and anticipatory pursuit.

Authors:  Coralie de Hemptinne; Philippe Lefèvre; Marcus Missal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control--IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions.

Authors:  E Kowler; A J Martins; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Fixation behavior in observation and imitation of human movement.

Authors:  M J Matarić; M Pomplun
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-10

9.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Age-related changes in imitating sequences of observed movements.

Authors:  Jessica Maryott; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements with random-dot kinematograms.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Edinah K Gnang; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Oddball distractors demand attention: neural and behavioral responses to predictability in the flanker task.

Authors:  Abigail Noyce; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Violations of newly-learned predictions elicit two distinct P3 components.

Authors:  Abigail Noyce; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.