Literature DB >> 2231559

Hysterectomy. A critical review.

G A Bachmann1.   

Abstract

Hysterectomy is of interest to the practicing obstetrician-gynecologist not only from the medical and surgical points of view but also because of the societal interest that the procedure attracts. The operation was first described in the third century A.D. writings of Soranus and before the turn of this century carried a very high surgical morbidity and mortality rate. With the technologic advances made during this century in both medical and surgical specialties, the operation has become quite safe, with a mortality rate of approximately 12/10,000 procedures. However, although it is possible to objectively measure the improved quality and increased quantity of life when hysterectomy is done for cancer treatment or other life-threatening conditions, it is difficult to so measure those parameters when hysterectomy is done solely to improve the quality of life. Today the physician's medical judgment and patient's understanding of the procedure are no longer the only criteria that have to be considered before surgery. Input by third-party payers, hospital administrators, quality assurance programs, second opinion programs and standards of practice in the geographic region also play a role. Also, alternatives to hysterectomy are being evaluated; in many circumstances they are being utilized today when hysterectomy would have been the treatment of choice before this decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  11 in total

1.  Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Dharmalingam; I Pool; J Dickson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Hysterectomy prevalence by Hispanic ethnicity: evidence from a national survey.

Authors:  Kate M Brett; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Risk factors for self-reported uterine fibroids: a case-control study.

Authors:  A R Samadi; N C Lee; W D Flanders; J R Boring; E B Parris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy. A preliminary study.

Authors:  M Canis; G Mage; C Chapron; A Wattiez; J L Pouly; M A Bruhat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Advances in gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  R L Levine; H Reich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  [Hysteroscopic surgery].

Authors:  R Kimmig
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Comparative evaluation of classical intrafascial-supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) with transuterine mucosal resection as performed by pelviscopy and laparotomy--our first 200 cases.

Authors:  L Mettler; K Semm; L Lehmann-Willenbrock; A Shah; P Shah; R Sharma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Key psychosocial challenges in vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Authors:  Martin Kumnig; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

9.  Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Julie K Bower; Pamela J Schreiner; Barbara Sternfeld; Cora E Lewis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Patients' expectations of outcome of hysterectomy and alternative treatments for menstrual problems.

Authors:  S Marchant-Haycox; D Liu; N Nicholas; P Salmon
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.