Literature DB >> 10983202

Accuracy of patients' recall of Pap and cholesterol screening.

S Newell1, A Girgis, R Sanson-Fisher, M Ireland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken in mid-1994 and assessed how accurately patients recall the recency and result of their most recent cholesterol and Papanicolaou (Pap) tests.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, door-to-door community survey was used to gather self-report and, subsequently, pathology laboratory data for 195 individuals.
RESULTS: In regard to cholesterol screening, 30% of individuals who reported being adequately screened were actually inadequately screened, 45% who reported normal cholesterol levels actually had elevated levels, and 21% of inadequately screened individuals and 56% of individuals with elevated levels were not identified by self-report. In terms of Pap screening, 28% of women who reported being adequately screened were actually inadequately screened, 11% of patients who reported a normal Pap test actually had abnormal or inadequate results, and 55% of inadequately screened individuals and 53% of individuals with abnormal or inadequate results were not identified by self-report.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed self-report to be a less-than-adequate measure of individuals' recall of cholesterol and Pap screening. Relying exclusively on self-report surveys as indicators of screening coverage is likely to result in significant underestimations of the proportion of people who are inadequately screened or whose results indicate a need for intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10983202      PMCID: PMC1447635          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.9.1431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: a methodological consideration in cervical screening research.

Authors:  J A Bowman; S Redman; J A Dickinson; R Gibberd; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Using patients' descriptions of alcohol consumption, diet, medication compliance, and cigarette smoking: the validity of self-reports in research and practice.

Authors:  V J Strecher; M H Becker; N M Clark; P Prasada-Rao
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The validity of self-reported exercise-induced sweating as a measure of physical activity.

Authors:  R A Washburn; S R Goldfield; K W Smith; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The effects of social demand on breast self-examination self-report.

Authors:  D L Beach; J A Mayer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1990-04

5.  Patients as reliable reporters of medical care process. Recall of ambulatory encounter events.

Authors:  J B Brown; M E Adams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Accuracy of women's self-report of their last Pap smear.

Authors:  J A Sawyer; J A Earp; R H Fletcher; F F Daye; T M Wynn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Methodologic issues in self-report of health behavior.

Authors:  T Baranowski
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.118

8.  What are women told about Pap smears that lack endocervical cells?

Authors:  M J Schofield; J E Byles; R Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.

Authors:  A Coulter; A Baldwin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-10

10.  Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared.

Authors:  D Degnan; R Harris; J Ranney; D Quade; J A Earp; J Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  23 in total

1.  Brief report: Housestaff adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Beverly A Forsyth; Julie R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Assessing the annual economic burden of preventing and treating anogenital human papillomavirus-related disease in the US: analytic framework and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Accuracy of Self-reported Abnormal Pap Smears Among Reproductive-age African-American Women.

Authors:  Kristen R Moore; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Pap smear rates among Haitian immigrant women in eastern Massachusetts.

Authors:  Eric H Green; Karen M Freund; Michael A Posner; Michele M David
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Cholesterol screening for women: who is "at-risk"?

Authors:  Cheryl L Robbins; Patricia M Dietz; Shanna Cox; Elena V Kuklina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; Ashwini Soman; Nancy Breen; Deanna Kepka; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD).

Authors:  Truls Ostbye; Gary N Greenberg; Donald H Taylor; Ann Marie M Lee
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in an inpatient hospital setting.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Lynn A Richards; Barbara Wilgus-Wegweiser; Karen Plowden; Dorothy L Rosenthal; Ann Klassen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Epidemiologic natural history and clinical management of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Disease: a critical and systematic review of the literature in the development of an HPV dynamic transmission model.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Hepatitis B vaccinations among Koreans: Results from 2005 Korea National Cancer Screening Survey.

Authors:  Hee-Soon Juon; Kui Son Choi; Eun-Cheol Park; Min-Son Kwak; Sunmin Lee
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.