Literature DB >> 2348457

The effects of social demand on breast self-examination self-report.

D L Beach1, J A Mayer.   

Abstract

The measurement of breast self-examination (BSE) adherence typically relies on verbal self-report. These studies systematically manipulated social demand within a face-to-face interview and examined the effects on self-reported BSE frequency. In Study 1, subjects (n = 37) received either a high-demand or a low-demand preface prior to being asked about BSE practice over the past year. Study 2 (n = 89) was a replication, with the addition of a no-preface (control) condition. Results from Study 1 indicated that although the conditions were comparable on demographic and breast cancer/BSE knowledge variables, the high-demand condition reported a significantly higher number of BSEs than the low-demand condition. An attenuation of this pattern was found in Study 2, with the control condition reporting a frequency between the low demand's and the high demand's reported frequencies. The implications for BSE intervention and prevalence research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2348457     DOI: 10.1007/bf00844999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  8 in total

1.  The effect of reward on compliance with breast self-examination.

Authors:  K E Grady; C Goodenow; J R Borkin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1988-02

2.  Assessing breast self-examination compliance in the natural environment.

Authors:  J A Mayer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1986-08

3.  Encouraging long-term compliance with breast self-examination: the evaluation of prompting strategies.

Authors:  J A Mayer; L W Frederiksen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1986-04

Review 4.  US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination. A critical review.

Authors:  M S O'Malley; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Social desirability response bias and dietary inventory responses.

Authors:  A Worsley; K I Baghurst; D R Leitch
Journal:  Hum Nutr Appl Nutr       Date:  1984-02

6.  Public attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Changes in breast self-examination behavior in a cohort of 8214 women in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  C J Baines; C Wall; H A Risch; J K Kuin; I J Fan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cue enhancement and the long-term practice of breast self-examination.

Authors:  K E Grady
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1984-06
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: a meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change.

Authors:  Kristina Wilson; Ibrahim Senay; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Michael Hennessy; Bonnie Spring; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  How compliant is compliant? Evaluating adherence with breast self-exam positions.

Authors:  V M Stevens; J W Hatcher; B K Bruce
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-10

3.  Action and inaction in multi-behaviour recommendations: a meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions.

Authors:  Dolores Albarracín; Kristina Wilson; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Marta Durantini; Flor Sanchez
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-09-22

4.  Accuracy of patients' recall of Pap and cholesterol screening.

Authors:  S Newell; A Girgis; R Sanson-Fisher; M Ireland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.