Literature DB >> 16423127

Brief report: Housestaff adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations.

Joseph S Ross1, Beverly A Forsyth, Julie R Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate training involves intensive clinical education characterized by long work hours with minimal flexibility. Time demands may be a barrier to obtaining preventive care for housestaff during postgraduate training.
OBJECTIVE: Assess adherence to United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cervical cancer screening recommendations.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of female housestaff at 1 university hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes included (1) adherence to USPSTF recommendations, (2) perception of adherence to recommendations, and (3) barriers to obtaining preventive care.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 204 housestaff. Overall, 81% of housestaff were adherent to USPSTF screening recommendations. Housestaff requiring screening in the past year were less likely to be adherent when compared with housestaff requiring screening in the past 3 years. Overall, 84% accurately perceived their screening behavior as adherent or nonadherent (kappa=0.58). Of the 43% who identified a barrier to obtaining preventive care, not having time to schedule or keep appointments was reported most frequently (n=72).
CONCLUSIONS: Housestaff accurately perceived their need for cervical cancer screening and were generally adherent to USPSTF recommendations, even though lack of time during postgraduate training was frequently reported as a barrier to obtaining preventive care. However, we found lower adherence among a small subgroup of housestaff at a slightly greater risk for cervical disease and most likely to benefit from screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16423127      PMCID: PMC1484609          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  13 in total

1.  The occupational risk of motor vehicle collisions for emergency medicine residents.

Authors:  M T Steele; O J Ma; W A Watson; H A Thomas; R L Muelleman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women.

Authors:  Usha Sambamoorthi; Donna D McAlpine
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995).

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pap smear noncompliance among female obstetrics-gynecology residents.

Authors:  Judith J Williams; Joseph T Santoso; Frank W Ling; Donna Przepiorka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Outcome of pregnancies experienced during residency.

Authors:  L M Osborn; D L Harris; J C Reading; M B Prather
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns.

Authors:  Laura K Barger; Brian E Cade; Najib T Ayas; John W Cronin; Bernard Rosner; Frank E Speizer; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Outcomes of pregnancy in a national sample of resident physicians.

Authors:  M A Klebanoff; P H Shiono; G G Rhoads
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Accuracy of patients' recall of Pap and cholesterol screening.

Authors:  S Newell; A Girgis; R Sanson-Fisher; M Ireland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures.

Authors:  N P Gordon; R A Hiatt; D I Lampert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Detecting Dysglycemia Using the 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force Screening Criteria: A Cohort Analysis of Community Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Ji Young Lee; Mercedes R Carnethon; Ronald T Ackermann; Maria C Vargas; Andrew Hamilton; Nivedita Mohanty; Sarah S Rittner; Jessica N Park; Amro Hassan; David R Buchanan; Lei Liu; Joseph Feinglass
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Racial and ethnic differences in personal cervical cancer screening amongst post-graduate physicians: results from a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Marcella Nuñez-Smith; Beverly A Forsyth; Julie R Rosenbaum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.