Literature DB >> 14754701

Effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in an inpatient hospital setting.

Cornelia L Trimble1, Lynn A Richards, Barbara Wilgus-Wegweiser, Karen Plowden, Dorothy L Rosenthal, Ann Klassen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of an inpatient, hospital-based cervical cancer screening program at a single institution.
METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2002, 1,117 women admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital underwent Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening during their hospital stay. In that time period, 111,933 women were screened at all of the combined Hopkins outpatient clinics. We compared rates of abnormal Pap tests in these cohorts (retrospective cohort study). Our main outcome measure was the prevalence of abnormal Pap tests among the screening population by age group, ethnicity, and insurance status compared between our outpatient and inpatient populations.
RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal Pap tests in the inpatient cohort was twice as high as that in the outpatient setting (15.5% versus 7%). The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), the immediate precursor lesion to cervical cancer, was nearly 5-fold higher in the inpatient cohort compared with the outpatient cohort (3% versus 0.7%). In multivariable models, younger women had greater risk for all types of abnormal Pap tests, and black women had greater risk for HSIL. Previous abnormal Pap and human immunodeficiency virus-positive status were associated with all abnormal tests and with HSIL results.
CONCLUSIONS: A hospital-based, inpatient Pap test program is an efficient strategy for targeting limited screening funds toward women at high risk of invasive cervical cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14754701      PMCID: PMC3139564          DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109209.93819.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Improving cervical cancer screening in hospital settings.

Authors:  A Klassen; A Hall; J Bowie; C S Weisman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.

Authors:  E D Paskett; C M Tatum; D W Mack; H Hoen; L D Case; R Velez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. The 1992 National Cancer Institute Workshop.

Authors:  R J Kurman; D E Henson; A L Herbst; K L Noller; M H Schiffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Missed opportunities for early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R G Fruchter; J Boyce; M Hunt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Accuracy of patients' recall of Pap and cholesterol screening.

Authors:  S Newell; A Girgis; R Sanson-Fisher; M Ireland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Advancing age and cervical cancer screening and prognosis.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; H Y Sung; K A Kearney; M Miller; W Kinney; R A Hiatt; J Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Cervical cancer screening in hospitals: the efficacy of legislation in Maryland.

Authors:  A C Klassen; D D Celentano; C S Weisman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut.

Authors:  D T Janerich; O Hadjimichael; P E Schwartz; D M Lowell; J W Meigs; M J Merino; J T Flannery; A P Polednak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy.

Authors:  L G Koss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  The influence of dermatologist and primary care physician visits on melanoma outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jeanne M Ferrante; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Ren Chen; Kate J Fisher; Kymia Love-Jackson; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Serum Chloride and Admission Status Are Potential Prognostic Markers of High-Risk Polyps: A Prospective Characterization of Colorectal Polyps in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Algassim; Toufic Semaan; Manhal A Aldaher; Abdulsalam Alluhaydan; Ameen Jaddoh; Saeed Al-Zubide; Shakir Bakkari; Naif Benragosh; Thamer Aldarsouny; Ibrahim Alruzug
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Hospitalized Women's Perspective on Willingness-to-Screen for Cancers in Relation to Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Jocelyn Shubella; Gina Kauffman; Waseem Khaliq
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  A captive audience: a pilot study of screening and counseling hospitalized women for fracture risk.

Authors:  Kathryn M Ryder; Lori A Kessler; Carol B Jones; Ronald I Shorr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Promote CRC Screening: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Mollie Aleshire; Amanda T Wiggins; Kelly Palmer; Jennifer Hatcher
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 2.592

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.