Literature DB >> 10976658

Impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporin therapy in transplant recipients.

P Belitsky1, S Dunn, A Johnston, G Levy.   

Abstract

The optimisation of cyclosporin therapy remains a challenge because of the very narrow therapeutic window and the highly variable pharmacokinetics of the drug. Therefore, there has been a concerted effort in the clinical transplant community to explore and test cyclosporin monitoring tools and techniques that will allow blood concentrations of cyclosporin to be maintained within the narrow therapeutic window in order to maximise efficacy and minimise toxicity. Absorption profiling is a simple and accurate technique for adjusting dosages of cyclosporin microemulsion that utilises an estimation of the rate and extent of cyclosporin absorption in order to optimise immunosuppression in the individual patient. Two estimation tools in particular are an abbreviated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for the first 4 hours postdose and a single sampling point at 2 hours postdose. These 2 monitoring strategies have not only been validated as an accurate estimation of cyclosporin bioavailability but have been demonstrated to significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients compared with traditional trough concentration monitoring. The evidence presented in this review demonstrates that absorption profiling results in the following clinical benefits compared with trough concentration monitoring: (i) reduced incidence of acute rejection; (ii) reduced severity of rejection episodes; (iii) reduced nephrotoxicity; and (iv) a rational basis for dosage adjustments. The optimisation of immunosuppressive therapy continues to be a major priority in the management of the organ transplant recipient. Absorption profiling is a sensitive and practical approach for optimising the dosage of cyclosporin microemulsion, and can further extend the benefits of cyclosporin immunosuppression in the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976658     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200039020-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  21 in total

1.  Stimulated response of peripheral lymphocytes may distinguish cyclosporine effect in renal transplant recipients receiving a cyclosporine+rapamycin regimen.

Authors:  R Sindhi; M F LaVia; E Paulling; J McMichael; G Burckart; S Shaw; L A Sindhi; R Livingston; S Sehgal; J Jaffe
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Comparative bioavailability of Neoral and Sandimmune in cardiac transplant recipients over 1 year.

Authors:  G F Cooney; V Jeevanandam; S Choudhury; G Feutren; E A Mueller; H J Eisen
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  High variability of drug exposure: a biopharmaceutic risk factor for chronic rejection.

Authors:  B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Pharmacodynamics of cyclosporine in heart and heart-lung transplant recipients. I: Blood cyclosporine concentrations and other risk factors for cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  N G Best; A K Trull; K K Tan; D J Spiegelhalter; N Cary; J Wallwork
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Low intrapatient variability of blood cyclosporine levels is correlated with excellent graft survival.

Authors:  S Savoldi; R Maiorca; M Maderna; R Chiappini; G Corbetta
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1997 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Reduced intrapatient variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients switched from oral Sandimmune to Neoral.

Authors:  R Mendez; H Abboud; J Burdick; B Copley; R Freeman; T D Batiuk; G F Cooney; R Barbeito
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation.

Authors:  J M Kovarik; E A Mueller; J B van Bree; W Tetzloff; K Kutz
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Reduced inter- and intrasubject variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients treated with a microemulsion formulation in conjunction with fasting, low-fat meals, or high-fat meals.

Authors:  B D Kahan; J Dunn; C Fitts; D Van Buren; D Wombolt; R Pollak; R Carson; J W Alexander; M Choc; R Wong
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Variable oral absorption of cyclosporine. A biopharmaceutical risk factor for chronic renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  B D Kahan; M Welsh; L Schoenberg; L P Rutzky; S M Katz; D L Urbauer; C T Van Buren
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy.

Authors:  M Cantarovich; J G Besner; J S Barkun; E Elstein; R Loertscher
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.863

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Hélène Bourgoin; Gilles Paintaud; Matthias Büchler; Yvon Lebranchu; Elisabeth Autret-Leca; France Mentré; Chantal Le Guellec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Routine Cyclosporine concentration - C2 level Monitoring. Is it helpful during the early post Transplant Period?

Authors:  A S Narula; Msn Murthy; Ksk Patrulu; V K Saxena
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Authors:  Frédéric Leger; Jean Debord; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau; Mathias Büchler; Gérard Lachâtre; Gilles Paintaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation with emphasis on limited sampling strategy.

Authors:  Abraham J Wilhelm; Peer de Graaf; Agnes I Veldkamp; Jeroen J W M Janssen; Peter C Huijgens; Eleonora L Swart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  María del Mar Fernández De Gatta; Dolores Santos-Buelga; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; María José García
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  The challenge of renal function in heart transplant children.

Authors:  Sylvie Di Filippo; Pierre Cochat; André Bozio
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Cyclosporine A monitoring--how to account for twice and three times daily dosing.

Authors:  Samuel Fanta; Janne T Backman; Paula Seikku; Christer Holmberg; Kalle Hoppu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Elias David-Neto; Lilian Monteiro Pereira Araujo; Nairo Massakazu Sumita; Maria Elizabeth Mendes; Maria Cristina Ribeiro Castro; Cristiane Feres Alves; Erica Kakehashi; Paschoalina Romano; Elisa Midori Yagyu; Margaret Queiroga; William Carlos Nahas; Luiz Estevam Ianhez
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Distribution of cyclosporin in organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Fatemeh Akhlaghi; Andrew K Trull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Cyclosporin therapeutic drug monitoring--an established service revisited.

Authors:  Raymond G Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2003-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.