Literature DB >> 27407668

Routine Cyclosporine concentration - C2 level Monitoring. Is it helpful during the early post Transplant Period?

A S Narula1, Msn Murthy2, Ksk Patrulu3, V K Saxena1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre dose or trough blood cyclosporine (CSA) concentration is routinely monitored and the result is used to alter patient's drug dosing. Patients with identical pre dose blood CSA may have very different systemic exposure to the drug. Recently CSA 2 hour post dose level [C2] has been reported to correlate better with drug exposure. We undertook this study to evaluate the influence of trough and C2, CSA concentration monitoring on short-term renal allograft outcomes.
METHODS: 25 patients of renal transplant receiving a triple drug regimen of CSA micro emulsion (Panacea Biotec) 8mg/kg, azathioprine 1mg/kg and prednisolone 0.5mg/kg were analyzed prospectively for graft outcomes. CSA levels were monitored in whole blood by radioimmunoassay using monoclonal antibodies, at 72 hours after the transplant.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 37.08 + 9.1 years. There were 20 males and 5 females. The mean age of donors was 40.2 + 8.2 years. There were 11 related donors with at least a haplomatch, 4 spousal and 10 unrelated donors with a nil antigen match. The mean pre dose CSA concentration was 289.22 + 171.9ng/ml; range (98.8 + 783.41ng/ml). The CSA concentration at 2 hours after the CSA administration was 838 + 310.87ng/ml (range, 169 + 1268ng/ml). 3 (12%) patients had acute rejection. In these patients the mean pre dose CSA concentration was 328.67ng/ml and the mean C2, CSA concentration was 1006.26ng/ml. CSA induced hemolytic uraemic syndrome was diagnosed in one patient. The trough and C2, CSA concentration levels were 174 and 870.83ng/ml respectively in this patient.
CONCLUSION: In our study CSA levels, trough and peak showed significant inter patient variability. The trough and C2 concentration levels did not correlate with the episodes of acute rejection. We conclude that in a triple drug regimen with fixed dosing schedules routine trough CSA level monitoring is not helpful in the acute post renal transplant period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2 levels; Cyclosporine levels; Cyclosporine trough levels

Year:  2011        PMID: 27407668      PMCID: PMC4923434          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(04)80003-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neoral use in the renal transplant recipient.

Authors:  P Belitsky
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Neoral absorption profiling: an evolution in effectiveness.

Authors:  P Belitsky; G A Levy; A Johnston
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine through levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients.

Authors:  M Cantarovich; J S Barkun; J I Tchervenkov; J G Besner; L Aspeslet; P Metrakos
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  K Mahalati; P Belitsky; I Sketris; K West; R Panek
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporin therapy in transplant recipients.

Authors:  P Belitsky; S Dunn; A Johnston; G Levy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy.

Authors:  M Cantarovich; J G Besner; J S Barkun; E Elstein; R Loertscher
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Efficacy of area under the curve cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation.

Authors:  M M Meyer; M Munar; J Udeaja; W Bennett
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 10.121

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Optimal sampling time-point for cyclosporin A concentration monitoring in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yixin Jia; Xu Meng; Yan Li; Chunlei Xu; Wen Zeng; Yuqing Jiao; Wei Han
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Cyclophilin inhibitors restrict Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus via interferon-λ in vitro and in mice.

Authors:  Lucie Sauerhering; Alexandra Kupke; Lars Meier; Erik Dietzel; Judith Hoppe; Achim D Gruber; Stefan Gattenloehner; Biruta Witte; Ludger Fink; Nina Hofmann; Tobias Zimmermann; Alexander Goesmann; Andrea Nist; Thorsten Stiewe; Stephan Becker; Susanne Herold; Christin Peteranderl
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 16.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.