Literature DB >> 7878754

Reduced inter- and intrasubject variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients treated with a microemulsion formulation in conjunction with fasting, low-fat meals, or high-fat meals.

B D Kahan1, J Dunn, C Fitts, D Van Buren, D Wombolt, R Pollak, R Carson, J W Alexander, M Choc, R Wong.   

Abstract

This cross-over study compared the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from cyclosporine (CsA) concentration-time profiles after administration of the corn oil-based soft gel cap (CsA-GC) with those with the microemulsion (CsA-ME) gel cap. Neither the fasting state nor the coadministration of a low- or high-fat breakfast affected the pharmacokinetics of CsA presented in either formulation. Comparisons of the three sets of pharmacokinetic parameters--namely, after fasting or after low-fat or after high-fat diets--demonstrated the CsA-ME formulation to display greater intraindividual reproducibility of the C0 and C12 trough levels (TLs), Cmax, tmax, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) than the CsA-GC formulation. Although the degree of interindividual variation in AUC, Cmax and tmax after CsA-ME administration was slightly, but significantly, less than after CsA-GC administration, there was no difference between the two formulations in terms of the customarily monitored C0 or C12 TL values. CsA-ME showed higher correlation coefficients of drug exposure (AUC) with C12 than CsA-GC (0.910 versus 0.712). However, CsA-ME administration resulted in only modest improvement over CsA-GC administration in the relationships between drug dose and C0, C12, or AUC--namely, 0.645 versus 0.496, 0.611 versus 0.517, and 0.700 versus 0.501, respectively. Correlation analysis between individual timed samples and AUC determinations revealed that CsA-ME requires significantly less frequent blood monitoring for prediction of total drug exposure than does CsA-GC. Although the clinical utility of this reproducible pharmacokinetic behavior remains to be demonstrated in the de novo transplant setting, the markedly reduced intraindividual variation produced by administration of CsA-ME will likely improve the accuracy of pretransplant prediction of, and reduce the frequency of subsequent adjustments in, CsA doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7878754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  22 in total

Review 1.  Limited sampling strategies.

Authors:  O David; A Johnston
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Food-drug interactions.

Authors:  Lars E Schmidt; Kim Dalhoff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Nanoparticles made of multi-block copolymer of lactic acid and ethylene glycol containing periodic side-chain carboxyl groups for oral delivery of cyclosporine A.

Authors:  D D Ankola; A Battisti; R Solaro; M N V Ravi Kumar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  [Cyclosporine monitoring in patients with chronic uveitis].

Authors:  S Schmidt; U Pleyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Population pharmacokinetic model to predict steady-state exposure to once-daily cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Franziska Schädeli; Hans-Peter Marti; Felix J Frey; Dominik E Uehlinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Immunosuppression in older renal transplant patients.

Authors:  J M Morales; J M Campistol; A Andrés; J C Herrero
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  An economic model of 2-hour post-dose ciclosporin monitoring in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Paul A Keown; Bryce Kiberd; Robert Balshaw; Shideh Khorasheh; Carlo Marra; Philip Belitsky; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Practical management of boceprevir and immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence.

Authors:  Audrey Coilly; Valérie Furlan; Bruno Roche; Caroline Barau; Coralie Noël; Laurence Bonhomme-Faivre; Teresa Maria Antonini; Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso; Didier Samuel; Anne-Marie Taburet; Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.