Literature DB >> 19232579

Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.

Yuyan Luo1, Lisa Kaufman, Renée Baillargeon.   

Abstract

The present research examined whether 5- to 6.5-month-old infants would hold different expectations about various physical events involving a box after receiving evidence that it was either inert or self-propelled. Infants were surprised if the inert but not the self-propelled box: reversed direction spontaneously (Experiment 1); remained stationary when hit or pulled (Experiments 3 and 3A); remained stable when released in midair or with inadequate support from a platform (Experiment 4); or disappeared when briefly hidden by one of two adjacent screens (the second screen provided the self-propelled box with an alternative hiding place; Experiment 5). On the other hand, infants were surprised if the inert or the self-propelled box appeared to pass through an obstacle (Experiment 2) or disappeared when briefly hidden by a single screen (Experiment 5). The present results indicate that infants as young as 5 months of age distinguish between inert and self-propelled objects and hold different expectations for physical events involving these objects, even when incidental differences between the objects are controlled. These findings are consistent with the proposal by Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79-106, Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119-148). New York: Cambridge University Press, and others that infants endow self-propelled objects with an internal source of energy. Possible links between infants' concepts of self-propelled object, agent, and animal are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232579      PMCID: PMC2695492          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  72 in total

1.  Object permanence in young infants: further evidence.

Authors:  R Baillargeon; J DeVos
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1991-12

2.  Why do infants make A not B errors in a search task, yet show memory for the location of hidden objects in a nonsearch task?

Authors:  A Ahmed; T Ruffman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1998-05

3.  Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent.

Authors:  Yuyan Luo
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

4.  Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent.

Authors:  Y Alpha Shimizu; Susan C Johnson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-09

5.  Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants.

Authors:  P C Quinn; P D Eimas
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1996-10

6.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age.

Authors:  G Gergely; Z Nádasdy; G Csibra; S Bíró
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-08

7.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach.

Authors:  A L Woodward
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-11

8.  Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants.

Authors:  Luca Surian; Stefania Caldi; Dan Sperber
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

9.  Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity.

Authors:  F Xu; S Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task in 6.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Andréa Aguiar; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07
View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Detecting impossible changes in infancy: a three-system account.

Authors:  Su-hua Wang; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children's reasoning about the natural world.

Authors:  Patricia Herrmann; Sandra R Waxman; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Intuitive physical reasoning about occluded objects by inexperienced chicks.

Authors:  Cinzia Chiandetti; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Twelve-Month-Old Infants' Encoding of Goal and Source Paths in Agentive and Non-Agentive Motion Events.

Authors:  Laura Lakusta; Susan Carey
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Innate Ideas Revisited: For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning.

Authors:  Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-01

6.  Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion.

Authors:  Jessica B Cicchino; Richard N Aslin; David H Rakison
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-30

7.  Explanation-based learning in infancy.

Authors:  Renée Baillargeon; Gerald F DeJong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

8.  Infants' representations of others' goals: representing approach over avoidance.

Authors:  Roman Feiman; Susan Carey; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-11

9.  Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account.

Authors:  Renée Baillargeon; Maayan Stavans; Di Wu; Yael Gertner; Peipei Setoh; Audrey K Kittredge; Amélie Bernard
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2012-01-12

10.  Rooks perceive support relations similar to six-month-old babies.

Authors:  Christopher D Bird; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.