Literature DB >> 10976498

Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome.

R M Cox1, G C Alexander.   

Abstract

Clinicians are often concerned that unrealistic prefitting expectations can have a negative impact on fitting success for new, hearing aid wearers. To investigate this concern and to explore the potential value of measuring expectations, we developed the Expected Consequences of Hearing aid Ownership (ECHO) questionnaire as a companion to the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire. Four experiments were conducted to (1) determine realistic expectations for hearing aids, (2) evaluate expectations of new users, (3) measure reliability of prefitting expectations, and (4) assess relationships between prefitting expectations and postfitting satisfaction. Novice hearing aid users were found to have stable prefitting expectations about hearing aids, and these expectations were unrealistically high for the typical individual. There were many different expectation patterns across subjects. Of the four subscales of the ECHO, only one was predictive of the corresponding satisfaction data. Potential clinical applications are described.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  23 in total

1.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Laura Kalstein; Cuttis J Billings; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 5.  Developing Foundational Counseling Skills for Addressing Adherence Issues in Auditory Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Carole E Johnson; Anna Marie Jilla; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-02-07

6.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.

Authors:  Melinda Anderson; Varsha Rallapalli; Tim Schoof; Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 8.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

9.  [Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation: audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes].

Authors:  S Arndt; R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; F Hassepass; G Ihorst; S Kroeger; P Kirchem; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.