Literature DB >> 10974293

Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography.

M Kuze1, Y Uji.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of the Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow (DTL) electrode in electroretinographic recordings (ERG) in subjects of all ages, we evaluated ERG responses obtained with the contact lens (CL) and DTL electrodes and estimated a DTL/CL ratio for each sample.
METHODS: Seventy-nine volunteers aged 2-84 years (79 normal eyes) were recruited for the study. Electroretinographic recordings elicited by monocular single-flash stimuli delivered by an automatic ERG recording system were recorded using both CL and the DTL electrodes (CL-ERG and DTL-ERG, respectively).
RESULTS: The relative amplitude of the DTL-ERG to the CL-ERG was 79.6-99.8% (mean = 93.4%) for the a-wave and 84.4-106.3% (mean = 92.3%) for the b-wave. The relative latency of the DTL-ERG to the CL-ERG was 86. 0-107.6% (mean = 98.2%) for the a-wave and 96.1-113.0% (mean = 97. 9%) for the b-wave. The a- and b-wave amplitudes differed significantly between DTL and CL electrodes only in the 40- to 49-year-old age groups (P <.05). Regression analysis indicated moderate to strong relationships between the electrodes for amplitude (a-wave, r = 0.690; b-wave, r = 0.824) and latency (a-wave, r = 0.667; b-wave, r = 0.725).
CONCLUSION: The DTL electrode has as high stability as the conventional CL electrodes for ERG recordings in most age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10974293     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(00)00177-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  6 in total

1.  Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.

Authors:  Hang Yin; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?

Authors:  Jungeun Woo; Suna Jung; Mathieu Gauvin; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.

Authors:  Ángel García-García; Francisco José Muñoz-Negrete; Gema Rebolleda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.

Authors:  Anastasia Lapkovska; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe; Margarita G Todorova
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram.

Authors:  Alice E Mentzer; Danielle M Eifler; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira; Nalinee Tuntivanich; Janice Q Forcier; Simon M Petersen-Jones
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Electroretinography in dogs using a fiber electrode prototype.

Authors:  A L Pereira; F Montiani-Ferreira; V R Santos; S R Salomão; C Souza; A Berezovsky
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.