BACKGROUND: The definition of the degree of lymph node metastasis (n-classification) for gastric cancer differs greatly in the new Union Internationale Contre le Cancer--TNM classification (5th edition) and the Japanese gastric cancer classification (JGC). The feasibility of the new TNM classification is evaluated in comparison with the JGC. METHODS: At Chiba University, 940 patients who underwent a gastrectomy were retrospectively classified into appropriate stages with both the TNM and JGC systems, and the survival curves of the respective stages were also compared. RESULTS: Patients with 1 to 6 metastatic nodes (TNM-pN1) showed similar survival rates whether the metastases were limited to the perigastric area (JGC-n1) or reached distant areas (JGC-n2). The patients with node metastasis that was limited to the perigastric area (JGC-n1) had significantly different survival rates, depending on the number of metastatic nodes (TNM-pN1 or pN2, P = .022). A similar phenomenon was also observed in patients with TNM-N2 and JGC-n2. A multivariate analysis indicated the TNM N-classification, rather than the JGC n-classification, as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The new TNM classification appears to be a better prognostic indicator than the JGC system for patients with gastric carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: The definition of the degree of lymph node metastasis (n-classification) for gastric cancer differs greatly in the new Union Internationale Contre le Cancer--TNM classification (5th edition) and the Japanese gastric cancer classification (JGC). The feasibility of the new TNM classification is evaluated in comparison with the JGC. METHODS: At Chiba University, 940 patients who underwent a gastrectomy were retrospectively classified into appropriate stages with both the TNM and JGC systems, and the survival curves of the respective stages were also compared. RESULTS:Patients with 1 to 6 metastatic nodes (TNM-pN1) showed similar survival rates whether the metastases were limited to the perigastric area (JGC-n1) or reached distant areas (JGC-n2). The patients with node metastasis that was limited to the perigastric area (JGC-n1) had significantly different survival rates, depending on the number of metastatic nodes (TNM-pN1 or pN2, P = .022). A similar phenomenon was also observed in patients with TNM-N2 and JGC-n2. A multivariate analysis indicated the TNM N-classification, rather than the JGC n-classification, as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The new TNM classification appears to be a better prognostic indicator than the JGC system for patients with gastric carcinoma.
Authors: N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Deniz Altinel; Fayyaz Khanani; Ipek Coban; Donald W Weaver; David A Kooby; Juan M Sarmiento; Charles Staley Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 7.842