Literature DB >> 10973008

Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters.

G Bernardi1, R Padovani, G Morocutti, E Vaño, M R Malisan, M Rinuncini, L Spedicato, P M Fioretti.   

Abstract

Few data are available on the quantitative assessment of complexity (C), especially in relation to a patient's exposure to radiation. The relationship between several clinical (CFs), anatomic (AFs), and technical factors (TFs) versus fluoroscopy time (FT) was evaluated in 402 random percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures. CFs were age, sex, single or multivessel disease, ejection fraction, and previous coronary artery bypass graft. AFs were assessed based on the American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology classification. TFs were multivessel PTCA, use of the double wire or double balloon technique, stenting, ostial stenting, bifurcation stenting, and intravascular ultrasonography. No CFs significantly influenced FT, whereas all AFs and TFs (except multivessel PTCA) did significantly influence FT. A scoring system was developed, and two complexity indexes (CI) were conceived, based on which the procedures were divided into three groups: simple, medium, and complex. The mean FTs were 471+/-289, 805+/-532, and 1,190+/-641 (P <0.0001), respectively. Total cine frame recordings were 1,119+/-572, 1,265+/-644 (P = 0.0355), and 1,418+/-785 (P<0.0001 vs. simple; P = NS vs. medium). The dose/area product measurement was 65.8+/-41.4, 93 +/-58.5 (P<0.0001), and 116.7+/-72.8 (P<0.0001 vs. simple; P = 0.00159 vs. medium), respectively. In our series, CI was directly related to AF and TF, but not to CF. Comparison of PTCA procedures and definition of appropriate FT should consider CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973008     DOI: 10.1002/1522-726x(200009)51:1<1::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  16 in total

1.  Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  N Journy; S Sinno-Tellier; C Maccia; A Le Tertre; P Pirard; P Pagès; D Eilstein; J Donadieu; O Bar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; J Birkel; M Schmitt; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Summary of the Italian inter-society recommendations for radiation protection optimization in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Renato Padovani; Maria Antonietta D'Avanzo; Sveva Grande; Francesco Campanella; Antonella Rosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Temporal trends of fluoroscopy time and contrast utilization in coronary chronic total occlusion revascularization: insights from a multicenter United States registry.

Authors:  Tesfaldet T Michael; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Mohammed Alomar; Shuaib M Abdullah; Ben L Kirkland; Katrina L Mishoe; Nicholas Lembo; Anna Kalynych; Harold Carlson; Subhash Banerjee; Michael Luna; William Lombardi; David E Kandzari
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Sustainability in the cardiac cath lab.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Gennaro Santoro; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Patient radiation dose audits for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures.

Authors:  Stephen Baiter; Marvin Rosenstein; Donald L Miller; Beth Schueler; David Spelic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme.

Authors:  R Ruiz-Cruces; E Vano; F Carrera-Magariño; F Moreno-Rodriguez; M M Soler-Cantos; M Canis-Lopez; J Hernández-Armas; F J Diaz-Romero; F Rosales-Espizua; J M Fernandez-Soto; R Sanchez-Casanueva; A Martin-Palanca; M Perez-Martinez; A Gil-Agudo; M A Zarca-Diaz; V Parra-Osorio; J J Muñoz Ruiz-Canela; T Moreno-Sanchez; A Lopez-Medina; C Moreno-Saiz; P Galan-Montenegro; J J Gallego-Beuter; M Gonzalez-de-Garay; J C Zapata-Jimenez; J M Pastor-Vega; S Cañete
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  V Neofotistou; E Vano; R Padovani; J Kotre; A Dowling; M Toivonen; S Kottou; V Tsapaki; S Willis; G Bernardi; K Faulkner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.