Literature DB >> 10969538

[Injuries of the inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis].

R Grass1, K Herzmann, A Biewener, H Zwipp.   

Abstract

The incidence of isolated distal tibiofibular syndesmotic ruptures in acute ankle sprains lies between 1% and 11%. These injuries are frequently overseen or misdiagnosed as anterolateral rotational instability of the ankle and often become apparent through protracted courses. Although the pathomechanics and extent of syndesmotic injuries have been systematically described by Lauge-Hansen and Weber, no generally accepted guidelines exist as to when these complex injuries are to be treated surgically to ensure sufficient and stable healing of the syndesmosis besides correct alignment of the distal fibula. So far, systematic follow-up regarding syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures is missing, although it has long been recognized that tibiofibular diastasis secondary to chronic syndesmotic instability leads to external rotation of the talus. In combination with a valgus position of the talus, this instability leads to a decrease in the contact area which results in posttraumatic arthritic changes. This paper reviews the standard diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for acute syndesmotic ruptures in fracture dislocations of the ankle. Among the few corrective procedures advocated for chronic syndesmotic insufficiency are tibiofibular arthrodesis, synthetic ligament substitutes, and tenodesis with the peroneus brevis tendon. A sufficient reconstruction must restore the stability of the ankle mortise and alignment of the fibula in the tibiofibular incisura to ensure limitation of talar rotation. Therefore, a tenodesis was developed which substitutes the three important ligaments of the syndesmotic complex. The Casting procedure for chronic syndesmotic insufficiency was modified with reconstruction of the interosseous tibiofibular ligament in addition to the anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments. The resulting three-point fixation of the distal fibula appears more anatomically, physiologically, and biomechanically advantageous. The operative procedure is given in detail. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Persistent instability of the distal syndesmosis. Ankle fractures. Syndesmotic screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10969538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  13 in total

1.  Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jan Bartonícek
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  [Causes of failed osteosynthesis of ankle fractures].

Authors:  R Holz; B Füchtmeier; E Mayr
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Biomechanical comparison of bionic, screw and Endobutton fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Baozhi Wang; Guohui Xu; Zhaohui Song; Huixian Cui; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Fractures of the upper ankle].

Authors:  M Frank; K Bauwens; A Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injury of the lower extremity in multiple-injured patients. A systematic literature review].

Authors:  D Rixen; S Sauerland; H-J Oestern; B Bouillon
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  The additional value of an oblique image plane for MRI of the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  John J Hermans; Abida Z Ginai; Noortje Wentink; Wim C J Hop; Annechien Beumer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A novel method of using elastic bionic fixation device for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Yingze Zhang; Zhaohui Song; Hengrui Chang; Ye Tian; Fei Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Unexpected revision procedures treating ankle fractures].

Authors:  J Richter; A Pommer; R Breuer; S Hullmann; D V Heyde; A Dávid
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  [Evidence for treatment of acute syndesmosis injuries in sports].

Authors:  R Best; F Mauch; G Bauer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  The Value of Ultrasound in Acute Ankle Injury: Comparison With MR.

Authors:  Petra Margetic; Martina Salaj; Ivan Zvonimir Lubina
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.