D Rixen1, S Sauerland, H-J Oestern, B Bouillon. 1. Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Lehrstuhl der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Klinikum Köln-Merheim. dieter.rixen@uni-wh.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lower extremity injuries make up a substantial proportion of the injuries in multiply injured patients. The aim of this systematic literature analysis was to give an overview of the levels of evidence for different management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injuries of the lower extremity in multiply injured patients to enable, in the presence of adequate evidence, the development of clinical management corridors or, if the evidence was found to be inadequate, to document the necessity for scientific proof. METHODS: Clinical trials were systematically collected (Medline, Cochrane and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (EL 1 to 5 according to the Oxford system). RESULTS: The necessity for primary or secondary definitive osteosynthesis of femur/tibia shaft fractures is still a matter of discussion. Intramedullary nailing is the preferred operative procedure for definitive treatment of femur shaft fractures. Stabilization of proximal and distal femur and tibia fractures is predominantly based on expert opinion. According to the literature, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is essential in fracture treatment. CONCLUSION: Numerous comparative studies (EL 2) dealing with management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injuries of the lower extremity in multiply injured patients are available, but there are only a few randomized studies. Based on the available data, it is possible to develop a rational therapy for this patient population.
OBJECTIVE: Lower extremity injuries make up a substantial proportion of the injuries in multiply injured patients. The aim of this systematic literature analysis was to give an overview of the levels of evidence for different management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injuries of the lower extremity in multiply injured patients to enable, in the presence of adequate evidence, the development of clinical management corridors or, if the evidence was found to be inadequate, to document the necessity for scientific proof. METHODS: Clinical trials were systematically collected (Medline, Cochrane and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (EL 1 to 5 according to the Oxford system). RESULTS: The necessity for primary or secondary definitive osteosynthesis of femur/tibia shaft fractures is still a matter of discussion. Intramedullary nailing is the preferred operative procedure for definitive treatment of femur shaft fractures. Stabilization of proximal and distal femur and tibia fractures is predominantly based on expert opinion. According to the literature, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is essential in fracture treatment. CONCLUSION: Numerous comparative studies (EL 2) dealing with management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injuries of the lower extremity in multiply injured patients are available, but there are only a few randomized studies. Based on the available data, it is possible to develop a rational therapy for this patient population.
Authors: Charalampos Zalavras; George C Velmahos; Linda Chan; Demetrios Demetriades; Michael J Patzakis Journal: Injury Date: 2005-03-29 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: W A Phillips; H S Schwartz; C S Keller; H R Woodward; W S Rudd; P G Spiegel; G S Laros Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1985-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Dieter Rixen; Eva Steinhausen; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Matthias Meier; Marc G Maegele; Bertil Bouillon; Edmund A M Neugebauer Journal: Trials Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Dieter Rixen; Eva Steinhausen; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Marc G Maegele; Bertil Bouillon; Guido Grass; Edmund A M Neugebauer Journal: Trials Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.279