Literature DB >> 20549205

The additional value of an oblique image plane for MRI of the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

John J Hermans1, Abida Z Ginai, Noortje Wentink, Wim C J Hop, Annechien Beumer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The optimal MRI scan planes of collateral ligaments of the ankle have been described extensively, with the exception of the syndesmotic ligaments. We assessed the optimal scan plane for depicting the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to determine the optimal oblique caudal-cranial and lateral-medial MRI scan plane, two fresh frozen cadaveric ankles were used. The angle of the scan plane that demonstrated the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular ligament uninterrupted in their full length was determined. In a prospective study this oblique scan plane was then used in addition to the axial and coronal planes, for MRI scans of both ankles in 21 healthy volunteers. Two observers independently evaluated the anterior tibiofibular ligament (ATIFL) and posterior tibiofibular ligament (PTIFL) regarding the continuity of the individual fascicles, thickness and wavy contour of the ligaments in both the axial and the oblique plane. Kappa was calculated to determine the interobserver agreement. McNemar's test was used to statistically quantify the significance of the two scan planes.
RESULTS: In the axial plane the ATIFL was in 31% (13/42) partly and in 69% (29/42) completely discontinuous; in the oblique plane the ATIFL was continuous in 88% (37/42) and partly discontinuous in 12% (5/42). Compared with the axial plane, the oblique plane demonstrated significantly less discontinuity (p<0.001), but not significantly less thickening (p=1.00) or less wavy contour (p=0.06) of the ATIFL. In the axial scan plane the PTIFL was continuous in 76% (32/42), partially discontinuous in 19% (8/42) and completely discontinuous in 5% (2/42); in the oblique plane the PTIFL was continuous in 100% (42/42). Compared with the axial plane, the oblique plane demonstrated significantly less discontinuity (p=0.002), but not significantly less thickening (p=1.00) or less wavy contour (p=0.50) of the PTIFL. The interobserver agreement score and kappa (κ) regarding the continuity for the ATIFL in the axial and oblique planes was 91% (κ=0.79) and 91% (κ=0.55) respectively; for the PTIFL it was 86% (κ=0.65) and 100% (κ = not defined).
CONCLUSION: The ATIFL and PTIFL are routinuely scanned in the orthogonal planes. The advantage of MRI scanning in an oblique image plane of about 45 degrees permits a better evaluation of the ligaments compared with the axial plane, particularly a better interpretation of ligament continuity, thickening and wavy contour. This may lead to a reduction in false-positive results, especially regarding partial or complete ligament ruptures. This can be of considerable aid in therapeutic management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549205      PMCID: PMC2989003          DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-0938-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute injured distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  T J Vogl; K Hochmuth; T Diebold; J Lubrich; R Hofmann; U Stöckle; O Söllner; S Bisson; N Südkamp; J Maeurer; N Haas; R Felix
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle.

Authors:  W J Hopkinson; P St Pierre; J B Ryan; J H Wheeler
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1990-06

3.  Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements.

Authors:  M E Brage; C R Bennett; J B Whitehurst; P J Getty; A Toledano
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Lateral ankle ligaments and tibiofibular syndesmosis. 13-MHz high-frequency sonography and MRI compared in 20 patients.

Authors:  P Milz; S Milz; M Steinborn; T Mittlmeier; R Putz; M Reiser
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-02

5.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  [Fresh rupture of the syndesmosis of the proximal ankle joint. Clinical significance and arthrographic diagnosis].

Authors:  E L Karl; W Wrazidlo
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Arthrographic diagnosis of rupture of the anterior syndesmosis of the upper ankle joint].

Authors:  W Wrazidlo; E L Karl; K Koch
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1988-05

8.  [Joint mechanical studies on post-traumatic arthrosas in the ankle joint. I. The intra-articular model fracture].

Authors:  U N Riede; R K Schenk; H Willenegger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1971

9.  The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Spiros G Pneumaticos; Philip C Noble; Sofia N Chatziioannou; Saul G Trevino
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population.

Authors:  J P Gerber; G N Williams; C R Scoville; R A Arciero; D C Taylor
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  10 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of individual ankle syndesmosis structures in asymptomatic and surgically treated cohorts.

Authors:  Thomas O Clanton; Charles P Ho; Brady T Williams; Rachel K Surowiec; Coley C Gatlin; C Thomas Haytmanek; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  CAIPIRINHA-accelerated 10-min 3D TSE MRI of the ankle for the diagnosis of painful ankle conditions: Performance evaluation in 70 patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Fritz; Susanne Bensler; Gaurav K Thawait; Esther Raithel; Steven E Stern; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach.

Authors:  John J Hermans; Annechien Beumer; Ton A W de Jong; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The predictive value of MRI in the syndesmotic instability of ankle fracture.

Authors:  Young Hwan Park; Min A Yoon; Won Seok Choi; Gi Won Choi; Suk Joo Hong; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Injury and Management.

Authors:  Chi Pan Yuen; Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-07-31

6.  Reconstruction of Chronic Injured Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis with Autogenous Tendon Graft: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Han-Lin Xu; Yu-Jie Song; Ying-Hui Hua
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Scanned versus Fused-Reconstructed Oblique MR-Images for Assessment of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis-Diagnostic PerFormance and Reader Agreement.

Authors:  Hannes Seuss; Matthias Hammon; Frank Roemer; Rafael Heiss; Rolf Janka; Michael Uder; Peter Dankerl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

8.  The prevalence of posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and inferior tibiofibular transverse ligament injuries in syndesmosis-injured ankles evaluated by oblique axial magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kousuke Shiwaku; Atsushi Teramoto; Kousuke Iba; Hidenori Otsubo; Tomoaki Kamiya; Hiroaki Shoji; Kota Watanabe; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Prevalence of Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Chicken Nugget in Iran.

Authors:  Hajar Madahi; Fatemeh Rostami; Ebrahim Rahimi; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 0.747

10.  Diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis instability in Weber type B malleolar fractures.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Yongxing Cao; Chonglin Yang; Xingchen Li; Yangbo Xu; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.