Literature DB >> 26814767

The Value of Ultrasound in Acute Ankle Injury: Comparison With MR.

Petra Margetic1, Martina Salaj, Ivan Zvonimir Lubina2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the ultrasound (US) in different grades of acute trauma by comparing with MR.
METHODS: We analyzed 30 patients, of average age 33, with acute ankle trauma, without fracture on standard radiograms. One week after injury all patients were sent for US. We used linear probe 8-15 MHz. Ten days later, the patients were examined on MR.
RESULTS: Anterior talofibular ligament was normal in 20.6% by US and in 20.3% by MR. Ligament lesion were found by ultrasound in 40%, proven in only 20.6% by MR. Ultrasound diagnosed 33,3% ruptured ligament, MR found 50% rupture of anterior talofibular ligament. In 80.3% cases the calcaneofibular ligament appeared to be intact with both methods. Ultrasound found stretch ligament in 10.6% cases and MR proved that in 10% cases. In other 6.6% cases, MR found complete rupture. Intraarticular effusion was found in 80.3% patients by US and in 86.6% by MR. Lesion of tendon of long peroneal muscle was found in 40.6% patients by both methods. Lesion of tendon of short peroneal muscle was found in 33.3% lesions and proved by MR in only 20.3% cases. In other patients findings were normal. US found 10% lesions of the tendon of anterior tibial muscle and MR found 10.3% lesions. US found 10.6% lesions of tendon of long halucis flexor and MR found 20%. Our results were statistically analyzed by cross-tabs, the Stuart-Maxwell test, Npar tests and the McNemar test.
CONCLUSION: US proved to be a good and reliable method for diagnosing Grade I and II of ankle sprain, but for proper evaluation of Grade III, MR is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower limb injuries; Orthopedic trauma

Year:  2008        PMID: 26814767     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-008-7174-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  21 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  R Kerr
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 2.  Clinical significance of MR imaging of the ankle and foot.

Authors:  D J Astion
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Treatment of lateral ankle sprains.

Authors:  Ejnar Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Ligaments of the lateral aspect of the ankle and sinus tarsi: an MR imaging study.

Authors:  J Beltran; A M Munchow; H Khabiri; D G Magee; R B McGhee; S B Grossman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention.

Authors:  Cheng-Feng Lin; Michael L Gross; Paul Weinhold
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  [Comparison of echography and magnetic resonance in sprains of the external compartment of the ankle].

Authors:  R Lagalla; A Iovane; M Midiri; A Lo Casto; M De Maria
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  [Injuries of the inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis].

Authors:  R Grass; K Herzmann; A Biewener; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Sonography of tendons.

Authors:  O S Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Glenn N Williams; Morgan H Jones; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Ultrasound in acute trauma of the ankle and hindfoot.

Authors:  E Geusens; S Pans; I Van Breuseghem; P Brys
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2002-10-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic high-resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of calcaneofibular ligament injury in chronic lateral ankle injury: a comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Carlo Antonio D Alvarez; Soichi Hattori; Yuki Kato; Shuzo Takazawa; Takuya Adachi; Shin Yamada; Hiroshi Ohuchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries.

Authors:  Georgina M Allen; David J Wilson; Stuart A Bullock; Marion Watson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Ankle Disorders in Adult Nigerians in Lagos.

Authors:  Bukunmi Michael Idowu; Babalola Ishmael Afolabi; Stephen Olaoluwa Onigbinde; Oghenetejiri Denise Ogholoh; Nkem Nnenna Nwafor
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  Impacting clinical evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injuries through analysis of ultrasound images.

Authors:  Vedpal Singh; Irraivan Elamvazuthi; Varun Jeoti; John George; Akshya Swain; Dileep Kumar
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.