Literature DB >> 17384919

Analysis of the visual and refractive outcome following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment over a four-year follow-up period.

Ayman Saeed1, Maeve O'Doherty, John O'Doherty, Michael O'Keefe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and refractive stability following LASIK retreatment over a four-year follow-up period.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 60 eyes of 52 patients underwent LASIK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. Retreatment was performed by lifting the original flap followed by laser ablation of the stromal bed. The main outcome measures at the latest follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety and stability. The mean follow-up time after retreatment was 22.3 +/- 10.5 (range 12-48 months).
RESULTS: The baseline mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.85 +/- 2.57 dioptres (D) (range +2.25 to -11.75 D). At the latest follow-up visit, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/9 or better in 88% of the eyes, the mean SE was -0.33 +/- 0.8 D (-2.50 to +2.25 D), and 77% of the eyes were within +/-0.50 D of target refraction. None of the patients lost lines of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and 25 eyes (41%) gained one or more lines. Three eyes (5%) developed peripheral epithelial in-growth and none of the patients had corneal ectasias or retinal complications.
CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment is a safe and effective procedure for correcting residual refractive errors after LASIK. After retreatment, the visual and refractive outcome remained stable during the four-year follow-up period of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17384919     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-007-9054-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.029


  23 in total

1.  Lasik enhancements: a comparison of lifting to recutting the flap.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Davis; David R Hardten; Michelle Lindstrom; Thomas W Samuelson; Richard L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Conventional and wavefront-guided myopic LASIK retreatment.

Authors:  George J C Jin; Kevin H Merkley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Robert Montés-Mico
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Incidence and associations of retreatment after LASIK.

Authors:  Peter S Hersh; Kristen L Fry; Douglas S Bishop
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Changes in quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Estibaliz Garamendi; Konrad Pesudovs; David B Elliott
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.

Authors:  I Brunette; J Gresset; J F Boivin; M Pop; P Thompson; G P Lafond; H Makni
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy retreatments after regressed myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  F Carones; L Vigo; A V Carones; R Brancato
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Flap lift for LASIK retreatment in eyes with myopia.

Authors:  Marcelo V Netto; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Mihai Pop; Yves Payette
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J J Pérez-Santonja; M J Ayala; H F Sakla; J M Ruíz-Moreno; J L Alió
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  3-Year follow-up after Lasik: assessing the risk factors for retreatment.

Authors:  Jorge E Valdez-García; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Rosa Martínez-Muñoz
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Enhancement for Residual Refractive Error after Primary LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Noor F Basharat; Nour Bundogji; Emilie L Ungricht; Ines M Darquea; Matthew E Conley; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.