Literature DB >> 10960985

Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.

B R Merz1, S Hunenbart, U C Belser.   

Abstract

This paper presents aa comparison between the 8-degree Morse Taper and the butt joint aa connections between an implant and an abutment. Three-dimensional, non-linear finite element models were created to compare the 2 connection principles under equal conditions. The loading configuration was thereby modeled according to a test setup actually used for the dynamic long-term testing of dental implants as required for regulatory purposes. The results give insight into the mechanics involved in each type of connection and are compared to actual findings with the testing machine. The comparison indicates the superior mechanics of conical abutment connections and helps to explain their significantly better long-term stability in the clinical application.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10960985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  30 in total

1.  Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Authors:  Kıvanç Akça; Atılım Eser; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Elçin Sağırkaya; Murat Cavit Çehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  External versus internal abutment connection implants: a survey of opinions and decision making among experienced implant dentists in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Hagiwara; Alan B Carr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  A Simple and Cost Effective Method used for Removal of a Fractured Implant Abutment Screw: A Case Report.

Authors:  Parth Satwalekar; K Subash Chander; B Anantha Reddy; N Sandeep; N Sandeep; Tanushree Satwalekar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

4.  Biomechanical effects of the implant material and implant-abutment interface in immediately loaded small-diameter implants.

Authors:  Aaron Yu-Jen Wu; Heng-Li Huang; Jui-Ting Hsu; Winston Chee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  In vitro analysis of the microbiological sealing of tapered implants after mechanical cycling.

Authors:  Deceles Cristina Costa Alves; Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Carlos Nelson Elias; Eduardo Vedovatto; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement- retained implant-supported dental prosthesis.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Chae-Heon Chung; Mee-Kyoung Son
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems.

Authors:  Jae-Young Jo; Dong-Seok Yang; Jung-Bo Huh; Jae-Chan Heo; Mi-Jung Yun; Chang-Mo Jeong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  The change of rotational freedom following different insertion torques in three implant systems with implant driver.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Kwon; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Compressive fatigue in titanium dental implants submitted to fluoride ions action.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia Roselino Ribeiro; Jorge Roberto Noriega; Fábio Roberto Dametto; Luís Geraldo Vaz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening.

Authors:  Eun-Sook Kim; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.