Literature DB >> 10955645

Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception.

D W Massaro1, M M Cohen.   

Abstract

The fuzzy logical model of perception [FLMP, Massaro, Perceiving Talking Faces: From Speech Perception to a Behavioral Principle (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)] has been extremely successful at describing performance across a wide range of ecological domains as well as for a broad spectrum of individuals. Because the model predicts optimal or maximally efficient integration, an important issue is whether this is the case for most individuals. Three databases are evaluated to determine to what extent a significant quantitative improvement in predictive ability can be obtained if integration is assumed to be somewhat inefficient. For the most part, there were no significant signs of inefficient integration. The previous differences found by Grant and Seitz [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2438-2450 (1998)] must be due to their measures of efficiency, which appear to be invalid and/or conflate information with integration efficiency. Finally, the descriptive ability of the FLMP is shown to be theoretically informative and not simply the model's ability to describe any possible outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10955645     DOI: 10.1121/1.429611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Some behavioral and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: a review and suggestions for new directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-09-29

5.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Laura M Getz; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  An assessment of behavioral dynamic information processing measures in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; James T Townsend
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-26

10.  Perception of incongruent audiovisual English consonants.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.