Literature DB >> 9669880

Optimizing energy potentials for success in protein tertiary structure prediction.

T L Chiu1, R A Goldstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Success in solving the protein structure prediction problem relies on the choice of an accurate potential energy function. for a single protein sequence, it has been shown that the potential energy function can be optimized for predictive success by maximizing the energy gap between the correct structure and the ensemble of random structures relative to the distribution of the energies of these random structures (the Z-score). Different methods have been described for implementing this procedure for an ensemble of database proteins. Here, we demonstrate a new approach.
RESULTS: For a single protein sequence, the probability of success (i.e the probability that the folded state is the lowest energy state) is derived. We then maximize the average probability of success for a set of proteins to obtain the optimal potential energy function. This results in maximum attention being focused on the proteins whose structures are difficult but not impossible to predict.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a lattice model of proteins, we show that the optimal interaction potentials obtained by our method are both more accurate and more likely to produce successful predictions than those obtained by other averaging procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9669880     DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fold Des        ISSN: 1359-0278


  7 in total

1.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Statistical significance of protein structure prediction by threading.

Authors:  L A Mirny; A V Finkelstein; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Design of an optimal Chebyshev-expanded discrimination function for globular proteins.

Authors:  Boris Fain; Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Evaluating and optimizing computational protein design force fields using fixed composition-based negative design.

Authors:  Oscar Alvizo; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein side chain modeling with orientation-dependent atomic force fields derived by series expansions.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Yaoqi Zhou; Nick Grishin; Daron M Standley
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Residue contact-count potentials are as effective as residue-residue contact-type potentials for ranking protein decoys.

Authors:  Dan M Bolser; Ioannis Filippis; Henning Stehr; Jose Duarte; Michael Lappe
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-12-08

7.  In silico mutational analysis and identification of stability centers in human interleukin-4.

Authors:  Sandeep Saini; Chander Jyoti-Thakur; Varinder Kumar; Akshay Suhag; Niharika Jakhar
Journal:  Mol Biol Res Commun       Date:  2018-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.