Literature DB >> 10947272

Measurement of radiotherapy x-ray skin dose on a chest wall phantom.

K Y Quach1, J Morales, M J Butson, A B Rosenfeld, P E Metcalfe.   

Abstract

Sufficient skin dose needs to be delivered by a radiotherapy chest wall treatment regimen to ensure the probability of a near surface tumor recurrence is minimized. To simulate a chest wall treatment a hemicylindrical solid water phantom of 7.5 cm radius was irradiated with 6 MV x-rays using 20x20 cm2 and 10x20 cm2 fields at 100 cm source surface distance (SSD) to the base of the phantom. A surface dose profile was obtained from 0 to 180 degrees, in 10 degrees increments around the circumference of the phantom. Dosimetry results obtained from radiochromic film (effective depth of 0.17 mm) were used in the investigation, the superficial doses were found to be 28% (of Dmax) at the 0 degrees beam entry position and 58% at the 90 degrees oblique beam position. Superficial dose results were also obtained using extra thin thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) (effective depth 0.14 mm) of 30% at 0 degrees, 57% at 90 degrees, and a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detector (effective depth 0.5 mm) of 43% at 0 degrees, 62% at 90 degrees. Because the differences in measured superficial doses were significant and beyond those related to experimental error, these differences are assumed to be mostly attributable to the effective depth of measurement of each detector. We numerically simulated a bolus on/bolus off technique and found we could increase the coverage to the skin. Using an alternate "bolus on," "bolus off" regimen, the skin would receive 36.8 Gy at 0 degrees incidence and 46.4 Gy at 90 degrees incidence for a prescribed midpoint dose of 50 Gy. From this work it is evident that, as the circumference of the phantom is traversed the SSD increases and hence there is an inverse square fluence fall-off, this is more than offset by the increase in skin dose due to surface curvature to a plateau at about 90 degrees. Beyond this angle it is assumed that beam attenuation through the phantom and inverse square fall-off is causing the surface dose to reduce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947272     DOI: 10.1118/1.599035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of 4 MV photon surface dose among Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linear accelerators for tangential breast treatment: a phantom study.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamaguchi; Kumiko Karasawa; Tomohisa Furuya; Takayuki Fujita; Yutaka Tutumi; Kohei Miura; Takahiro Takada; Kana Ito; Shuichi Ozawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

3.  Superficial dosimetry imaging based on Čerenkov emission for external beam radiotherapy with megavoltage x-ray beam.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Adam K Glaser; David J Gladstone; Colleen J Fox; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Skin dose study of chest wall treatment with tomotherapy.

Authors:  Khosrow Javedan; Geoffrey Zhang; Richard Mueller; Eleanor Harris; Lawrence Berk; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  In vivo real-time rectal wall dosimetry for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Dean L Cutajar; Peter E Metcalfe; Michael L F Lerch; Vladimir L Perevertaylo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Superficial dosimetry imaging of Čerenkov emission in electron beam radiotherapy of phantoms.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Colleen J Fox; Adam K Glaser; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A novel phantom model for mouse tumor dose assessment under MV beams.

Authors:  Michael S Gossman; Indra J Das; Subhash C Sharma; Jeffrey P Lopez; Candace M Howard; Pier Claudio
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Technique and outcome of post-mastectomy adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy-the role of tissue-equivalent bolus in reducing risk of local recurrence.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Turner; Anthi Zeniou; Amanda Williams; Rema Jyothirmayi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Assessment of skin dose in breast cancer radiotherapy: on-phantom measurement and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Nastaran Mohamadian; Mohammad Mohammadi; Mahdi Ghorbani; Mohsen Hassani; Benyamin Khajetash; Farideh Khorshidi; Courtney Knaup
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-03-18

10.  Evaluation of skin dose associated with different frequencies of bolus applications in post-mastectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fundagul Andic; Yasemin Ors; Rima Davutoglu; Sule Baz Cifci; Emine Burcin Ispir; Mehmet Ertugrul Erturk
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.