Literature DB >> 22835649

Optimal field-splitting algorithm in intensity-modulated radiotherapy: evaluations using head-and-neck and female pelvic IMRT cases.

Xin Dou1, Yusung Kim, John E Bayouth, John M Buatti, Xiaodong Wu.   

Abstract

To develop an optimal field-splitting algorithm of minimal complexity and verify the algorithm using head-and-neck (H&N) and female pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) cases. An optimal field-splitting algorithm was developed in which a large intensity map (IM) was split into multiple sub-IMs (≥2). The algorithm reduced the total complexity by minimizing the monitor units (MU) delivered and segment number of each sub-IM. The algorithm was verified through comparison studies with the algorithm as used in a commercial treatment planning system. Seven IMRT, H&N, and female pelvic cancer cases (54 IMs) were analyzed by MU, segment numbers, and dose distributions. The optimal field-splitting algorithm was found to reduce both total MU and the total number of segments. We found on average a 7.9 ± 11.8% and 9.6 ± 18.2% reduction in MU and segment numbers for H&N IMRT cases with an 11.9 ± 17.4% and 11.1 ± 13.7% reduction for female pelvic cases. The overall percent (absolute) reduction in the numbers of MU and segments were found to be on average -9.7 ± 14.6% (-15 ± 25 MU) and -10.3 ± 16.3% (-3 ± 5), respectively. In addition, all dose distributions from the optimal field-splitting method showed improved dose distributions. The optimal field-splitting algorithm shows considerable improvements in both total MU and total segment number. The algorithm is expected to be beneficial for the radiotherapy treatment of large-field IMRT. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22835649      PMCID: PMC3997753          DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic splitting of large intensity-modulated fields.

Authors:  Q Wu; M Arnfield; S Tong; Y Wu; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Automatic feathering of split fields for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi; Bahman Emami
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimal field splitting for large intensity-modulated fields.

Authors:  Srijit Kamath; Sartaj Sahni; Sanjay Ranka; Jonathan Li; Jatinder Palta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Generalized field-splitting algorithms for optimal IMRT delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Srijit Kamath; Sartaj Sahni; Jonathan Li; Sanjay Ranka; Jatinder Palta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; Wolfgang A Tomé; Hazim Jaradat; Bridget M Raisbeck; Mark A Ritter
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  IMRT of large fields: whole-abdomen irradiation.

Authors:  Linda Hong; Kaled Alektiar; Chen Chui; Tom LoSasso; Margie Hunt; Spiridon Spirou; Jay Yang; Howard Amols; Clifton Ling; Zvi Fuks; Steve Leibel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Loren K Mell; Hanifi Tiryaki; Kang-Hyun Ahn; Arno J Mundt; John C Roeske; Bulent Aydogan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.