Literature DB >> 10940600

Validation of the AMPFlSTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework.

E A Cotton1, R F Allsop, J L Guest, R R Frazier, P Koumi, I P Callow, A Seager, R L Sparkes.   

Abstract

The AMPFlSTR((R)) SGM Plus system is a commercially available STR multiplex produced by Applied Biosystems, a division of Perkin Elmer, Foster City, California, USA that supersedes SGM. The multiplex contains the six SGM loci, amelogenin and four additional loci. These additional loci are D3S1358, D19S433, D16S539 and D2S1338. Consequently, the match probability is significantly improved (conservatively quoted as 1 in 10(9) for reporting a full profile match). The system was subjected to validation. For example, ageing and degradation studies demonstrated semen stains to be the most stable evidence type, whereas buccal scrapes were the least stable. An apparent rise in the sensitivity increases the chance of obtaining successful results from the more difficult samples submitted for analysis. Two of the new loci (D3S1358 and D19S433) are low molecular weight (between 100 and 150 base pairs); this improved the success rates of the degraded samples where high molecular weight loci may drop out. Of 26 non-primates tested, four gave results that appeared as single peaks and were unlikely to cause interpretation problems. None of the 19 micro-organisms tested gave discernible results. Extensive casework and simulated casework studies demonstrated that SGM and SGM plus results were comparable. There was one example of a null allele (primer binding site mutation) recorded at the HUMFIBRA locus (in both systems). However, a concordance study of 1000 samples using both SGM and SGM plus did not demonstrate any differences in typing.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940600     DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00182-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  21 in total

1.  The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime.

Authors:  G N Rutty; A Hopwood; V Tucker
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Rare failures in the amelogenin sex test.

Authors:  M Steinlechner; B Berger; H Niederstätter; W Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The GEDNAP blind trial concept part II. Trends and developments.

Authors:  S Rand; M Schürenkamp; C Hohoff; B Brinkmann
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Validation of the multiplex kit genRESMPX-2 for forensic casework analysis.

Authors:  A Junge; T Lederer; G Braunschweiger; B Madea
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Unusual variant alleles in commonly used short tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  P Grubwieser; R Mühlmann; H Niederstätter; M Pavlic; W Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Characterisation of variant alleles in the STR systems D2S1338, D3S1358 and D19S433.

Authors:  Marielle Heinrich; Heike Felske-Zech; Bernd Brinkmann; Carsten Hohoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Validation of a short tandem repeat multiplex typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat samples.

Authors:  Nikia Coomber; Victor A David; Stephen J O'Brien; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Development and validation for identity testing of I-DNADuo, a combination of I-DNA1 and a new multiplex system, I-DNA2.

Authors:  Adrian Odriozola; Jose María Aznar; David Celorrio; Maria Luisa Bravo; Juan Jose Builes; Marian Martinez de Pancorbo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Development and validation of I-DNA1: a 15-Loci multiplex system for identity testing.

Authors:  A Odriozola; J M Aznar; D Celorrio; M L Bravo; J J Builes; J F Val-Bernal; Marian M de Pancorbo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 10.  DNA reviews: the national DNA database of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  E A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.