Literature DB >> 10924380

When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy?

M J Bagnall1, A J Evans, A R Wilson, H Burrell, S E Pinder, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if the number of flecks of calcification retrieved at stereotaxic core needle biopsy or the number of core samples obtained containing calcification are related to biopsy sensitivity, and to determine how many calcifications or cores containing calcification the radiologist should aim to retrieve when sampling mammographic microcalcification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of core specimen radiographs from 57 consecutive patients who had stereotaxic core needle biopsies of impalpable malignant microcalcifications without an associated mammographic mass. The total number of calcifications retrieved and the numbers of cores containing calcification were correlated with findings at core and surgical histology.
RESULTS: Increasing retrieval of calcification elements visible on specimen radiography was associated with increasing sensitivity of the biopsy. Five or more flecks of calcium gave an absolute sensitivity of 100%. Increasing numbers of core samples obtained containing radiographically demonstrable calcification was also associated with increasing sensitivity. Three or more cores containing calcium resulted in a 100% absolute sensitivity for malignancy.
CONCLUSION: To ensure adequate sampling of calcification at core biopsy, an optimum of either three or more cores containing calcium or five or more flecks of calcium in total is required. Achieving this target ensures a high pre-operative diagnosis rate for malignant microcalcifications.Bagnall, M. J. C. (2000). Clinical Radiology 55, 548-553. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924380     DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  8 in total

Review 1.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Minimally Invasive Biopsy Methods - Diagnostics or Therapy? Personal Opinion and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Microcalcification on mammography: approaches to interpretation and biopsy.

Authors:  Louise Wilkinson; Val Thomas; Nisha Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Randomized controlled trial of stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for the diagnosis and management of mammographic microcalcification.

Authors:  Sara M Bundred; Anthony J Maxwell; Julie Morris; Yit Y Lim; Md Janick Harake; Sigrid Whiteside; Nigel J Bundred
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Stereotactically guided breast biopsy: a review.

Authors:  Victoria Ames; Peter D Britton
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-01-20

7.  US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Hua Sun Kim; Min Jung Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: radiological diagnosis.

Authors:  Andy Evans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.466

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.