Literature DB >> 10915879

Visual motion detection in man is governed by non-retinal mechanisms.

M Bach1, M B Hoffmann.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that there is no sizable proportion of motion detectors in the primate retina. To test this specifically for humans, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded simultaneously to visual motion onset (9.3 degrees /s) of an expanding or contracting 'dartboard'. The degree of motion-specific responses in cortex and retina was assessed by testing the direction specificity of motion adaptation with three conditions in a fully balanced paradigm: motion-onset potentials were measured after adaptation to: (1) a stationary pattern; (2) motion in the same direction as the test stimulus; and (3) motion in the opposite direction. Motion-onset responses in the VEP were dominated by the typical N2 at 150 ms, in the ERG by a positivity at 70 ms. Onset of contraction or expansion evoked virtually identical VEP and ERG responses (P>0.5). Motion adaptation produced strong direction-specific effects in the VEP (P<0.05), but not in the ERG (P=0.58): In the adapting and non-adapting direction the VEP (N2) was reduced by 75 and 50% (P<0.001), the ERG by 32 and 26% (P<0.01 and 0.05), respectively. The striking difference of the direction-specificity of motion adaptation between cortex and retina suggests that in humans the vast majority of motion-specific processing occurs beyond the retinal ganglion cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10915879     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00106-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  S P Heinrich; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms.

Authors:  J Peter Maurer; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Within-session reproducibility of motion-onset VEPs: effect of adaptation/habituation or fatigue on N2 peak amplitude and latency.

Authors:  Jan Kremlácek; Miroslav Kuba; Zuzana Kubová; Jana Langrová; Frantisek Vít; Jana Szanyi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Krystel R Huxlin; Voyko Kavcic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An asymmetric outer retinal response to drifting sawtooth gratings.

Authors:  Nina Riddell; Laila Hugrass; Jude Jayasuriya; Sheila G Crewther; David P Crewther
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.