Literature DB >> 11518457

Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

S P Heinrich1, M Bach.   

Abstract

Recording a VEP usually involves prolonged repetitions of the stimulus, but the influence of adaptation is rarely discussed in this context. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1 the time course of the response amplitude during steady-state stimulation was assessed. During the first seconds of stimulation we found an increase in amplitude, followed by a continuous exponential decline. This confirmed earlier results. There is considerable inter-subject variability concerning all aspects of the time course in our 19 subjects. Experiment 2 used two types of transient pattern reversal stimuli: one regular stimulus as used in standard clinical applications and one with a pause in between each reversal. N1 and P1 amplitudes did not show significant differential effects. N2 amplitude was reduced by 73% in the standard condition whereas P1 peak time increased slightly but significantly (3.2 ms).

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518457     DOI: 10.1023/a:1017509717071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  33 in total

1.  The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency in the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  P Jakobsson; B Johansson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Spatial-frequency-tuned attenuation and enhancement of the steady-state VEP by grating adaptation.

Authors:  S Suter; C A Armstrong; P S Suter; J C Powers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.

Authors:  W H Ridder; D McCulloch; A M Herbert
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler; R D Hamer; W Wesemann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The effect of adaptation to the stimulating pattern on the latency and wave form of visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A L Ochs; M J Aminoff
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05

7.  Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man.

Authors:  L Schlykowa; B W van Dijk; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1993-10

8.  Short-term changes in the response characteristics of the human visual evoked potential.

Authors:  N S Peachey; P J DeMarco; R Ubilluz; W Yee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A rapid evoked potential index of cortical adaptation.

Authors:  J I Nelson; W H Seiple; M J Kupersmith; R E Carr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Fourier transformed steady-state flash evoked potentials for continuous monitoring of visual pathway function.

Authors:  R Bergholz; T N Lehmann; G Fritz; K Rüther
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Electrophysiological indices of surround suppression in humans.

Authors:  M Isabel Vanegas; Annabelle Blangero; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Adaptive changes of inner retina function in response to sustained pattern stimulation.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Lori M Ventura
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials can be explained by temporal superposition of transient event-related responses.

Authors:  Almudena Capilla; Paula Pazo-Alvarez; Alvaro Darriba; Pablo Campo; Joachim Gross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Steady-state motion visual evoked potentials produced by oscillating Newton's rings: implications for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Jun Xie; Guanghua Xu; Jing Wang; Feng Zhang; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Role of Visual Noise in Influencing Mental Load and Fatigue in a Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Jun Xie; Guanghua Xu; Ailing Luo; Min Li; Sicong Zhang; Chengcheng Han; Wenqiang Yan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Neural correlates of perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma in humans.

Authors:  R S Weil; J M Kilner; J D Haynes; G Rees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Visual evoked potentials in subgroups of migraine with aura patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Martina Bracaglia; Davide Di Lenola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Mariano Serrao; Vincenzo Parisi; Antonio Di Renzo; Francesco Martelli; Antonello Fadda; Jean Schoenen; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.