Literature DB >> 12851804

Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms.

J Peter Maurer1, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

Onset of visual motion evokes a component in the EEG, the motion onset VEP. Exploring its motion specificity with a direction-specific adaptation paradigm, previous work demonstrated that less than 50% of the motion onset VEP represents actual motion detection. Here, we tested whether preadaptation of flicker-sensitive mechanisms can help to isolate motion-specific responses in the VEP. Flicker preadaptation was accomplished by limiting dot lifetime in the random-dot kinematograms that we used to study the direction specificity of motion adaptation. With unlimited dot lifetime, motion adaptation reduced the VEP amplitude to 35% (adapted direction) and 50% (opposite direction). With the shortest dot lifetime (40 ms), motion adaptation reduced the amplitude to 55% (adapted direction) and 70% (opposite direction). These findings suggest that random-dot kinematograms with short dot lifetimes could improve the investigation of human motion processing, be it in electrophysiology or other fields. While such stimuli successfully preadapt flicker-related components, they still evoke a sizable response, of which an estimated 70% is motion-specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851804     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1509-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  The motion aftereffect: more than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies.

Authors:  H Hautzel; J G Taylor; B J Krause; N Schmitz; L Tellmann; K Ziemons; N J Shah; H Herzog; H W Müller-Gärtner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Visual evoked potentials specific for motion onset.

Authors:  M Kuba; Z Kubová
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Zeki; J D Watson; C J Lueck; K J Friston; C Kennard; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli.

Authors:  C L Baker; R F Hess; J Zihl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Isolation and characteristics of a steady-state visually-evoked potential in humans related to the motion of a stimulus.

Authors:  R J Snowden; D Ullrich; M Bach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Principles of visual motion detection.

Authors:  A Borst; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Spectral sensitivity for flicker and acuity criteria.

Authors:  C R Ingling; B H Tsou
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials.

Authors:  Z Kubová; M Kuba; H Spekreijse; C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visual evoked potentials to sudden reversal of the motion of a pattern.

Authors:  P G Clarke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-01-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  7 in total

1.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion adaptation: net duration matters, not continuousness.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Anja M Schilling; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Difficulties of motion-onset VEP interpretation in school-age children.

Authors:  Zuzana Kubova; Miroslav Kuba; Jan Kremlacek; Jana Langrova; Jana Szanyi; Frantisek Vit; Marie Chutna
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.