Literature DB >> 10915454

Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain.

K M Coppola1, J Bookwala, P H Ditto, L K Lockhart, J H Danks, W D Smucker.   

Abstract

Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatment are known to vary by type of medical condition and treatment. Less is known about how treatment preferences vary based on underlying health dimensions, such as the nature of the impairment, prognostic information, and the experience of pain. Fifty elderly adults stated preferences for 4 life-sustaining treatments in response to 4 pairs of health state scenarios. Overall, life-sustaining treatments were preferred less in response to (a) cognitive versus physical impairment, (b) when the prognosis described no chance versus a very slight chance of recovery/improvement, and (c) if pain was present. These findings have implications for the way in which preferences for life-sustaining treatments are recorded in advance directives. Historically, advance directives have been limited by overly broad or overly specific statements about treatment preferences. Recording underlying health dimensions that guide treatment decisions may allow decision makers to generalize and apply patient preferences to novel health conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10915454     DOI: 10.1080/074811899200803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Death Stud        ISSN: 0748-1187


  18 in total

1.  Aging prisoners' treatment selection: does prospect theory enhance understanding of end-of-life medical decisions?

Authors:  Laura L Phillips; Rebecca S Allen; Grant M Harris; Andrew H Presnell; Jamie Decoster; Ronald Cavanaugh
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-05-18

2.  Family factors in end-of-life decision-making: family conflict and proxy relationship.

Authors:  Susan Mockus Parks; Laraine Winter; Abbie J Santana; Barbara Parker; James J Diamond; Molly Rose; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  "Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Lauren R Bangerter; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Allison R Heid; Katherine Abbott
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences.

Authors:  Deborah Carr; Sara M Moorman
Journal:  Sociol Forum (Randolph N J)       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  The acceptability of ending a patient's life.

Authors:  M Guedj; M Gibert; A Maudet; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Ask a different question, get a different answer: why living wills are poor guides to care preferences at the end of life.

Authors:  Laraine Winter; Susan M Parks; James J Diamond
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Robert Gramling; Adam G Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?

Authors:  S Frileux; C Lelièvre; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  [Validation of the Life-Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ) for its use in Spain].

Authors:  Inés María Barrio-Cantalejo; Rosa María Bailón Gómez; María Carmen Cámara Medina; María Angeles Carmona Cabezas; María Encarnación Martínez Cruz; Paula Quesada Lupiáñez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Preferences for life-prolonging medical treatments and deference to the will of god.

Authors:  Laraine Winter; Marie P Dennis; Barbara Parker
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2008-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.