Literature DB >> 21254816

Family factors in end-of-life decision-making: family conflict and proxy relationship.

Susan Mockus Parks1, Laraine Winter, Abbie J Santana, Barbara Parker, James J Diamond, Molly Rose, Ronald E Myers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined proxy decision-making regarding end-of-life treatment decisions. Proxy accuracy is defined as whether proxy treatment choices are consistent with the expressed wishes of their index elder. The purpose of this study was to examine proxy accuracy in relation to two family factors that may influence proxy accuracy: perceived family conflict and type of elder-proxy relationship.
METHODS: Telephone interviews with 202 community-dwelling elders and their proxy decision makers were conducted including the Life-Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ), and a measure of family conflict, and sociodemographic characteristics, including type of relationship.
RESULTS: Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with the type of elder-proxy relationship. Adult children demonstrated the lowest elder-proxy accuracy and spousal proxies the highest elder-proxy accuracy. Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with family conflict. Proxies reporting higher family conflict had lower elder-proxy accuracy. No interaction between family conflict and relationship type was revealed.
CONCLUSIONS: Spousal proxies were more accurate in their substituted judgment than adult children, and proxies who perceive higher degree of family conflict tended to be less accurate than those with lower family conflict. Health care providers should be aware of these family factors when discussing advance care planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21254816      PMCID: PMC3037808          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  22 in total

1.  Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain.

Authors:  K M Coppola; J Bookwala; P H Ditto; L K Lockhart; J H Danks; W D Smucker
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov

2.  The legal and functional status of the medical proxy: suggestions for statutory reform.

Authors:  Charles P Sabatino
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.

Authors:  C M Breen; A P Abernethy; K H Abbott; J A Tulsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  A national agenda for social work research in palliative and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Betty J Kramer; Grace H Christ; Mercedes Bern-Klug; Richard B Francoeur
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination.

Authors:  W H Roccaforte; W J Burke; B L Bayer; S P Wengel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Actual and perceived gender differences in the accuracy of surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment among older spouses.

Authors:  Laura Zettel-Watson; Peter H Ditto; Joseph H Danks; William D Smucker
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  2008

7.  Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do.

Authors:  W D Smucker; R M Houts; J H Danks; P H Ditto; A Fagerlin; K M Coppola
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-13

10.  The effects of race on patient preferences and spouse substituted judgments.

Authors:  Rachel Pruchno; Francine P Cartwright; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2009
View more
  18 in total

1.  Blood ties and trust: a comparative history of policy on family consent in Japan and the United States.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nagai
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2017-11

2.  Prognostic awareness and communication preferences among caregivers of patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  A J Applebaum; K Buda; M Kryza-Lacombe; J J Buthorn; R Walker; K M Shaffer; T A D'Agostino; E L Diamond
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Persistent problems in end-of-life planning among young- and middle-aged American couples.

Authors:  Sara M Moorman; Megumi Inoue
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Licensing Surrogate Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-06

5.  [Quality of dying processes after commencement of the German Living Will Act : Experiences of a surgical intensive care unit].

Authors:  S Strauss; D Kuppinger; W H Hartl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  "My Family Wants Something Different": Discordance in Perceived Personal and Family Treatment Preference and Its Association With Do-Not-Resuscitate Order Placement.

Authors:  Login S George; William Breitbart; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Measuring Goal-Concordant Care in Palliative Care Research.

Authors:  Natalie C Ernecoff; Kathryn L Wessell; Antonia V Bennett; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.576

8.  "In Eight Minutes We Talked More About Our Goals, Relationship, Than We Have in Years": A Pilot of Patient-Caregiver Discussions in a Neuro-Oncology Clinic.

Authors:  Dana Ketcher; Lee Ellington; Brian R W Baucom; Margaret F Clayton; Maija Reblin
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.680

9.  The Me in We dyadic communication intervention is feasible and acceptable among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Dana Ketcher; Casidee Thompson; Amy K Otto; Maija Reblin; Kristin G Cloyes; Margaret F Clayton; Brian R W Baucom; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Impact of family caregivers' awareness of the prognosis on their quality of life/depression and those of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  EunKyo Kang; Bhumsuk Keam; Na-Ri Lee; Jung Hun Kang; Yu Jung Kim; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Kyung Hae Jung; Su-Jin Koh; Hyewon Ryu; Jihye Lee; Jiyeon Choo; Shin Hye Yoo; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.