Literature DB >> 14662811

When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?

S Frileux1, C Lelièvre, M T Muñoz Sastre, E Mullet, P C Sorum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover what factors affect lay people's judgments of the acceptability of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia and how these factors interact.
DESIGN: Participants rated the acceptability of either physician assisted suicide or euthanasia for 72 patient vignettes with a five factor design--that is, all combinations of patient's age (three levels); curability of illness (two levels); degree of suffering (two levels); patient's mental status (two levels), and extent of patient's requests for the procedure (three levels). PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 66 young adults, 62 middle aged adults, and 66 older adults living in western France. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: In accordance with the functional theory of cognition of N H Anderson, main effects, and interactions among patient factors and participants' characteristics were investigated by means of both graphs and ANOVA.
RESULTS: Patient requests were the most potent determinant of acceptability. Euthanasia was generally less acceptable than physician assisted suicide, but this difference disappeared when requests were repetitive. As their own age increased, participants placed more weight on patient age as a criterion of acceptability.
CONCLUSIONS: People's judgments concur with legislation to require a repetition of patients' requests for a life ending act. Younger people, who frequently are decision makers for elderly relatives, place less emphasis on patient's age itself than do older people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14662811      PMCID: PMC1733803          DOI: 10.1136/jme.29.6.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  53 in total

1.  Death and the research imperative.

Authors:  D Callahan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Support for physician-assisted suicide: exploring the impact of ethnicity and attitudes toward planning for death.

Authors:  K L Braun; V M Tanji; R Heck
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2001-02

Review 3.  Physician-assisted dying: review of issues and roles for health psychologists.

Authors:  S R Sears; A L Stanton
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide.

Authors:  S N Whitney; B W Brown; H Brody; K H Alcser; J G Bachman; H T Greely
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Eliciting patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  P C Sorum; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; A Gamelin
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Euthanasia, nursing and care of the dying: rethinking Kuhse and Singer.

Authors:  S Aranda; M O'Conner
Journal:  Aust Nurs J       Date:  1995-08

7.  Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician's role.

Authors:  D P Caddell; R R Newton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Doctors' and nurses' attitudes towards and experiences of voluntary euthanasia: survey of members of the Japanese Association of Palliative Medicine.

Authors:  A Asai; M Ohnishi; S K Nagata; N Tanida; Y Yamazaki
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Public opinion regarding end-of-life decisions: influence of prognosis, practice and process.

Authors:  P A Singer; S Choudhry; J Armstrong; E M Meslin; F H Lowy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Attitudes of older people toward suicide and assisted suicide: an analysis of Gallup Poll findings.

Authors:  L Seidlitz; P R Duberstein; C Cox; Y Conwell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Euthanasia in patients with cancer and the continuous-care providers].

Authors:  Carlos Camps Herrero; Joaquín Gavilá Gregori; Javier Garde Noguera; Cristina Caballero Díaz; Vega Iranzo González-Cruz; Asunción Juárez Marroquí; Maria José Safont Aguilera; Ana Blasco Cordellat; Alfonso Berrocal Jaime; Maria Godes Sanz de Bremond
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  The role of nurses in physician-assisted deaths in Belgium.

Authors:  Els Inghelbrecht; Johan Bilsen; Freddy Mortier; Luc Deliens
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Chapple; S Ziebland; A McPherson; A Herxheimer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The acceptability of ending a patient's life.

Authors:  M Guedj; M Gibert; A Maudet; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Standardized "malhotra-wig vignettes" for research in India : a review with full text.

Authors:  H K Malhotra; N N Wig
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Nathalie Burkert; Franziska Großschädl; Éva Rásky; Willibald J Stronegger; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A role for judges in assisted dying.

Authors:  Ana Castelló; Francesc Francès; Fernando Verdú
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2009-05-30

8.  Canadian Undergraduates' Perspectives on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): A Quantitative Study.

Authors:  Erin Hawrelak; Lori Harper; John R Reddon; Russell A Powell
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.980

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.