Literature DB >> 10912843

Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius.

M Weiss1, A Ben-Shlomo, P Hagag, S Ish-Shalom.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a disease that culminates in fragility fractures and, therefore, imposes major burden on the health economy. In dealing with this worldwide condition, it is prudent to use a reliable, inexpensive, portable diagnostic means that does not use ionizing radiation and is capable of measuring bone properties at several sites. Recently, a quantitative ultrasound device (Omnisense) that measures speed of sound (SOS) at multiple skeletal sites was introduced. The Omnisense combines the 'axial transmission' mode and the critical angle concept. Preliminary reports suggested that of the different skeletal sites measured by this device, the distal third of the radius is the preferred measurement site for osteoporosis. In this cross-sectional study, SOS was determined at the radius using Omnisense in 50 hip-fractured elderly women (group F, age 76.1 +/- 6.0 years), 130 elderly controls (group NF, age 71.5 +/- 5.2 years) and 185 young healthy controls (group YH, age 40.6 +/- 3.0 years). Actual SOS was significantly lower in group F compared with group NF (p = 0.0001). Whereas SOS T-scores calculated for each woman and stratified into age subgroups within each of the study groups indicate decline from -2.22 to -3.56 in group F and from -1.56 to -3.17 in group NF, there was an increase from -0.02 to 0.03 in group YH. Age- and BMI-adjusted logistic regression for hip fracture discrimination indicated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for hip fracture of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86; p = 0.005) and an odds ratio of 1.92 (95% CI, 1.22-3.02; p = 0.005). We conclude that SOS measured at the radius by Omnisense discriminates subjects with hip fracture. from controls. Prospective studies are needed to support the role of Omnisense in assessing the risk of hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912843     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  14 in total

1.  Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius.

Authors:  Wojciech Pluskiewicz; Bogna Drozdzowska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Longitudinal monitoring of bone accretion measured by quantitative multi-site ultrasound (QUS) of bones in patients with delayed puberty (a pilot study).

Authors:  Zvi Zadik; Tali Sinai; Ella Borondukov; Amnon Zung; Irit Yaniv; Ram Reifen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Changes in distribution of bone densitometry equipment from 1996 to 2006 in Japan.

Authors:  Hirose Yamauchi; Masao Fukunaga; Akira Nishikawa; Hajime Orimo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The effect of calcium intake and physical activity on bone quantitative ultrasound measurements in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dario Prais; Gary Diamond; Avi Kattan; Jacob Salzberg; Dov Inbar
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Multi-site quantitative ultrasound compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of body mass index and inflamed soft tissue on reproducibility.

Authors:  A Pfeil; J Böttcher; H J Mentzel; G Lehmann; M L Schäfer; A Kramer; A Petrovitch; B E Seidl; A Malich; G Hein; G Wolf; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Discrimination of fractures by low-frequency axial transmission ultrasound in postmenopausal females.

Authors:  P Moilanen; M Määttä; V Kilappa; L Xu; P H F Nicholson; M Alén; J Timonen; T Jämsä; S Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bilateral variation in radial bone speed of sound.

Authors:  H Vrahoriti; J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; George Ioannidis; Kenneth S Davison
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.