Literature DB >> 10912840

Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians.

R Ridout1, G A Hawker.   

Abstract

A stratified (urban/rural), computer-generated random sample of 797 Ontario members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada received a self-administered questionnaire by mail. The questionnaire examined current use of bone densitometry, focusing on reasons for its use, factors that limit use, and features of the report that are helpful to the family physician in subsequent patient management. The response rate was 64% (457/711) after excluding 77 physicians who no longer practice family medicine. Ninety-two percent of the physicians used densitometry; of these, 97% ordered the test in the past year. Compared with urban physicians, rural physicians were more likely to 'never use densitometry' (p=0.04). Rural physicians who reported using densitometry used it less frequently (p=0.002), were less likely to have local access (p=0.001), and were less confident in its use (p=0.004) than their urban counterparts. Risk factors and hormone replacement therapy decision-making were ranked equally as the most frequent reasons for ordering the test, followed by follow-up. Few physicians identified limits to their use of densitometry. Female physicians used densitometry more frequently (p = 0.03) and were more confident in its use (p = 0.02). Features of the bone density report found to be most helpful were the statement of fracture risk, suggestions for further investigation, management and follow-up, and percent reduction in bone density compared with age-matched controls. The use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians is consistent with published guidelines. These physicians identified the estimate of fracture risk and suggestions for investigation and management as the most helpful features of the bone density report. This suggests a role for the incorporation of clinical data in bone density reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912840     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  16 in total

1.  What do they contribute? Family medicine residents who practise in cities.

Authors:  Joanna Bates; Rodney Andrew
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain.

Authors:  L Pérez-Edo; M Ciria Recasens; C Castelo-Branco; P Orozco López; A Gimeno Marqués; C Pérez; J Manasanch Dalmau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Increased serum osteopontin is a risk factor for osteoporosis in menopausal women.

Authors:  I-C Chang; T-I Chiang; K-T Yeh; H Lee; Y-W Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Preventive screening. What factors influence testing?

Authors:  Murray M Finkelstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  Gillian Hawker; Rowena Ridout; Maria Ricupero; Susan Jaglal; Earl Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

7.  Family physicians' personal and practice characteristics that are associated with improved utilization of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis medication prescribing.

Authors:  George Ioannidis; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lehana Thabane; Amiram Gafni; Anthony Hodsman; Brent Kvern; Aleksandra Walsh; Famida Jiwa; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 8.  Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions.

Authors:  Charles A Morris; Danielle Cabral; Hailu Cheng; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  [Reality of treatment of osteoporotic fractures in German trauma departments. A contribution for outcome research].

Authors:  T Vogel; P Kampmann; D Bürklein; H Böhm; B Ockert; C Kirchhoff; K G Kanz; K J Pfeifer; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Diagnosing osteoporosis in primary care in Spain (ABOPAP 2000 study)].

Authors:  R Aragonès Forès; P Orozco López
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.