Literature DB >> 12396940

[Diagnosing osteoporosis in primary care in Spain (ABOPAP 2000 study)].

R Aragonès Forès1, P Orozco López.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discover how osteoporosis is tackled in Spanish primary care before the publication of the semFYC osteoporosis guide.
DESIGN: Self-filled questionnaire for primary care doctors sent out by commercial mail (in blocks per province).
SETTING: Five thousand family medicine clinics in Spain.Participants. Doctors working in primary care.Measurements. Level of activity relating to osteoporosis in daily consultations (identification of risk factors, screening, who conducts diagnosis and follow-up, level of access to densitometry and specialist) and identification data (province, type of work centre and number of consultations per day). MAIN
RESULTS: 414 replies embracing reformed and non-reformed centres from the entire country, with different case overloads. 32.3% stated that osteoporosis treatment was viewed as a preventive activity in their centre and only 35.5% systematically asked for family history of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis screening was high in determined situations (82.9% in vertebral compression, 78.3% in hip fracture) and deficient in others (59.6% in glucocorticoid treatment, 46.6% in colles fractures, 36% in chronic nephropathy, 29.2% in thinness, 17.1% in chronic hepatopathy and 11.8% in treatment for epilepsy or with lithium). 73.9% could not request bone densitometry and 64.3% thought that access to other care levels was complicated. 51.9% said they continued to monitor osteoporosis. The impossibility of requesting densitometry or difficult access conditioned the screening level. There were differences in access according to autonomous communities, with Catalonia having best access to Densitometry (75%), followed by the communities of Madrid, Valencia and Euskadi (30%).
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of osteoporosis in primary care is deficient and is partly conditioned by difficulty in access to diagnostic tests and the lack of systematic screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396940      PMCID: PMC7676007          DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79046-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  8 in total

1.  Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians.

Authors:  R Ridout; G A Hawker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Managing elderly people's osteoporosis. Why? Who? How?

Authors:  A Juby
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Osteoporosis management in long-term care. Survey of Ontario physicians.

Authors:  H G McKercher; R G Crilly; M Kloseck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  [Prevalence of osteoporosis assessed by densitometry in the Spanish female population].

Authors:  M Díaz Curiel; J J García; J L Carrasco; J Honorato; R Pérez Cano; A Rapado; C Alvarez Sanz
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2001-01-27       Impact factor: 1.725

5.  Physician characteristics associated with the use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  L J Papa; B E Weber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A prospective evaluation of the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in a cohort of elderly subjects.

Authors:  A G Juby; P Davis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Clinical reporting to primary care physicians leads to increased use and understanding of bone densitometry and affects the management of osteoporosis. A randomized trial.

Authors:  J L Stock; C E Waud; J A Coderre; J H Overdorf; J S Janikas; K M Heiniluoma; M A Morris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Does the French general practitioner correctly investigate and treat osteoporosis? Groupe Rhumatologique d'Etudes Cliniques de Midi-Pyrénées.

Authors:  M Laroche; B Mazières
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain.

Authors:  L Pérez-Edo; M Ciria Recasens; C Castelo-Branco; P Orozco López; A Gimeno Marqués; C Pérez; J Manasanch Dalmau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  [Risk of fractures in women over 65 years old at a primary care center].

Authors:  Daniel Martínez Laguna; Anna Farran Aragonés; Astrid Carmen Crespo Lessmann
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  [Indication of bone densitometry in women over 40 years of age].

Authors:  Mc Moreno Girao; F Centelles Mañosa; E Jovell Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  [Incidence of hip fractures due to osteoporosis in relation to the prescription of drugs for their prevention and treatment in Galicia, Spain].

Authors:  María Mercedes Guerra-García; José Benito Rodríguez-Fernández; Elías Puga-Sarmiento; María Ángeles Charle-Crespo; Claudia Sofía Gomes-Carvalho; Ana Prejigueiro-Santás
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  [Management of osteoporosis at a primary care center].

Authors:  M Zwart Salmerón; M Fradera Vilalta; P Solanas Saura; C González Pastor; C Adalid Vilar
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Screening for osteoporosis among post-menopausal women in community pharmacy.

Authors:  Damià Barris Blundell; Carmen Rodríguez Zarzuelo; Belén Sabio Sánchez; José Luis Gutiérrez Álvarez; Elena Navarro Visa; Oscar Muñoz Valdés; Belén Garrido Jiménez; Rocío Sánchez Gómez
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2006-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.