Literature DB >> 14745487

Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain.

L Pérez-Edo1, M Ciria Recasens, C Castelo-Branco, P Orozco López, A Gimeno Marqués, C Pérez, J Manasanch Dalmau.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the current situation in Spain regarding diagnosis and care of patients with osteoporosis in the primary care setting. A total of 2,500 primary care physicians who were homogeneously grouped in autonomous communities throughout the country received a postal 30-item anonymous self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire covered demographics and personal characteristics of the physicians, conditions in everyday consultation, and degree of knowledge with regard to risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of the disease. The overall response was 850 (34%). The mean age of physicians surveyed was 43 years (range 23-66 years). The percentage of physicians specialized in community and family medicine was 46.7%. In 55.2% of cases, years of practice ranged between 11 and 20, and 55.7% of physicians visited between 31 and 50 patients per day. Age and years of practice were not associated with daily number of visits. Only 4% of physicians stated that there were specific programs for osteoporosis implemented in their primary care center. Diagnostic complementary investigations that could be ordered included plain radiographs in 96.2% of cases and bone densitometry in 27.8%. Laboratory tests included serum hormones in 61.6% of cases, PTH in 50.2%, and bone alkaline phosphatase in 33.4%. The diagnosis of osteoporosis was made always personally in 25.2% of cases. Personal diagnosis and follow-up, as well as actions directed to detection of osteoporosis were significantly higher among physicians working in centers with specific programs for osteoporosis. With regard to knowledge about osteoporosis, the mean percentage of correct responses was 63%. The percentage of correct responses was inversely associated with age and years of practice, and positively associated with speciality of community and family medicine. Primary care providers are in a good position to assess risk factors and recommend prevention strategies, as well as to play an active role in the diagnosis, care, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis. Practitioners of younger age and relatively few years of practice were those with more up-to-date information regarding the disease, and the existence of a specific program for osteoporosis seems to improve the management of this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745487     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1569-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  14 in total

1.  Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians.

Authors:  R Ridout; G A Hawker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  [The sequelae of osteoporotic femoral fracture in Barcelona].

Authors:  H Knobel; A Díez; D Arnau; A Alier; J Ibáñez; I Campodarve; A Supervía; X Nogués
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 1.725

Review 3.  Involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Osteoporosis prevention counseling during health maintenance examinations.

Authors:  S Schrager; M B Plane; M P Mundt; E A Stauffacher
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Physician characteristics associated with the use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  L J Papa; B E Weber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Christine Simonelli; Kathleen Killeen; Susan Mehle; Leah Swanson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England.

Authors:  D H Solomon; M T Connelly; C J Rosen; B Dawson-Hughes; D P Kiel; S L Greenspan; E S Leib; M Holick; A H Miguel; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  How hip and whole-body bone mineral density predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study.

Authors:  A M Schott; C Cormier; D Hans; F Favier; E Hausherr; P Dargent-Molina; P D Delmas; C Ribot; J L Sebert; G Breart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Does the French general practitioner correctly investigate and treat osteoporosis? Groupe Rhumatologique d'Etudes Cliniques de Midi-Pyrénées.

Authors:  M Laroche; B Mazières
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  [Diagnosing osteoporosis in primary care in Spain (ABOPAP 2000 study)].

Authors:  R Aragonès Forès; P Orozco López
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

View more
  14 in total

1.  Perception, knowledge, and use by general practitioners of Belgium of a new WHO tool (FRAX) to assess the 10-year probability of fracture.

Authors:  O Bruyère; D Nicolet; S Compère; V Rabenda; P Jeholet; B Zegels; P Maassen; G Pire; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care.

Authors:  A S Mendis; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Knowledge about osteoporosis and its related factors among public health nurses in Taiwan.

Authors:  I-Ju Chen; Shu Yu; Tze-Fang Wang; Shun-Ping Cheng; Lian-Hua Huang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Osteoporosis practice patterns in 2006 among primary care physicians participating in the NORA study.

Authors:  T W Weiss; E S Siris; E Barrett-Connor; P D Miller; C A McHorney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  [Reality of treatment of osteoporotic fractures in German trauma departments. A contribution for outcome research].

Authors:  T Vogel; P Kampmann; D Bürklein; H Böhm; B Ockert; C Kirchhoff; K G Kanz; K J Pfeifer; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Trends in HRT and anti-osteoporosis medication prescribing in a European population after the WHI study.

Authors:  L Huot; C M Couris; V Tainturier; S Jaglal; C Colin; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Managing Osteoporosis: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Primary Care Physicians in Israel.

Authors:  Yacov Fogelman; Inbal Goldshtein; Elena Segal; Sofia Ish-Shalom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How General Practitioners and Their Patients Adhere to Osteoporosis Management: A Follow-Up Survey among Czech General Practitioners.

Authors:  Magda Vytrisalova; Tereza Touskova; Leos Fuksa; Roman Karascak; Vladimir Palicka; Svatopluk Byma; Jan Stepan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Knowledge and Awareness of Osteoporosis among Saudi Physicians and Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mushabab Ayed Alghamdi; Abdel Gaffar AbdelAllah Mohammed
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Osteoporosis awareness among primary care physicians in Malaysia.

Authors:  Esha Das Gupta; Emily Man Lee Goh; Suk Chyn Gun; Heselynn Hussein; Nor Shuhaila Shahril; Swan Sim Yeap; Rajalingham Sakthiswary
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.068

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.