Literature DB >> 12371308

Preventive screening. What factors influence testing?

Murray M Finkelstein1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with having preventive screening tests in a population-based sample of Ontario women.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from Statistics Canada's National Population Health Survey linked to data from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan to ascertain whether women aged 20 or older had Pap smears, mammography, bone densitometry, or cholesterol testing. Factors associated with having testing were subjected to logistic regression analysis.
SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 20 or older; from 19,600 Canadian households, 2232 Ontario women gave consent to linkage of administrative databases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-specific population screening rates. Odds ratios and probabilities of having screening in relation to socioeconomic, geographic, and physician-associated factors.
RESULTS: Having screening was associated with age, income, education, and place of residence. Women with regular physicians were more likely to have Pap smears (odds ratio [OR] 4.4, range 1.7 to 12), densitometry (OR 22, range 3.6 to 140), and cholesterol testing (OR 8.0, range 2.3 to 29). Women who had periodic health examinations were more likely to have Pap smears (OR 6.7, range 4.6 to 9.8), mammograms (OR 3.7, range 2.3 to 5.9), densitometry (OR 3.7, range 1.3 to 10.5), and cholesterol testing (OR 3.0, range 2.0 to 4.5). The probability of having testing increased with number of visits a year to a doctor, but ceased to increase after three visits.
CONCLUSION: Having screening tests was associated with socioeconomic factors including income, education, and place of residence. Patients who went to doctors for episodic care only were less likely to have preventive screening than patients who went for periodic health examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12371308      PMCID: PMC2214098     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  19 in total

1.  Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians.

Authors:  R Ridout; G A Hawker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Direct observation of rates of preventive service delivery in community family practice.

Authors:  K C Stange; S A Flocke; M A Goodwin; R B Kelly; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Can we change physicians' practices in the delivery of cancer-preventive services?

Authors:  M T Ruffin
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  When can odds ratios mislead?

Authors:  H T Davies; I K Crombie; M Tavakoli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

5.  Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients.

Authors:  B Hutchison; C A Woodward; G R Norman; J Abelson; J A Brown
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Busy physicians and preventive services for adults.

Authors:  R Chaudhry; T E Kottke; J M Naessens; T J Johnson; M A Nyman; L A Cornelius; J D Petersen
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Trade-offs in high-volume primary care practice.

Authors:  S J Zyzanski; K C Stange; D Langa; S A Flocke
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk factors by socioeconomic status among Canadian adults.

Authors:  R Choinière; P Lafontaine; A C Edwards
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Preventive care and barriers to effective prevention. How do family physicians see it?

Authors:  B G Hutchison; J Abelson; C A Woodward; G Norman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Patient and visit characteristics associated with opportunistic preventive services delivery.

Authors:  S A Flocke; K C Stange; M A Goodwin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  18 in total

1.  Implementation of electronic medical records: effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver; Jan Barnsley; Richard H Glazier; Rahim Moineddin; Bart J Harvey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system.

Authors:  S Demeter; W D Leslie; L Lix; L MacWilliam; G S Finlayson; M Reed
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Who delivers preventive care as recommended?: Analysis of physician and practice characteristics.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; John Feightner; Moira Stewart; Cathy Thorpe; Andrea Burt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Continuity in provider and site of care and preventive services receipt in an adult Medicaid population with physical disabilities.

Authors:  Susan M Allen; Susan Wieland; Jane Griffin; Pedro Gozalo
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.554

5.  Disparities in receipt of screening tests for cancer, diabetes and high cholesterol in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using area-based methods.

Authors:  Cornelia M Borkhoff; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck; Nancy N Baxter; Ying Liu; Jill Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  Sociodemographic determinants in preventive tests for cardiovascular diseases in a representative sample of the adult Greek population.

Authors:  Georgia Pallikarona; Chara Tzavara; Christine Dimitrakaki; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-04-12

7.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Uptake of Preventive Services Among Patients With and Without Multimorbidity.

Authors:  Maria A Ukhanova; Carrie J Tillotson; Miguel Marino; Nathalie Huguet; Ana R Quiñones; Brigit A Hatch; Teresa Schmidt; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Factors affecting use of preventive tests for cardiovascular risk among Greeks.

Authors:  Evelina Pappa; Nick Kontodimopoulos; Angelos A Papadopoulos; Georgia Pallikarona; Dimitris Niakas; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.