Literature DB >> 108968

Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography, and computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms.

J H Snow, H M Goldstein, S Wallace.   

Abstract

A comparison of scintigraphy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) in 94 proven patients with clinically suspected liver disease is reported. CT proved to be the most accurate in detecting masses and assessing the complete extent of intrahepatic disease. The most reliable combination was CT and scintigraphy. The specific advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. The diagnostic scheme followed in the imaging evaluation of an hepatic mass in our clinical practice is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 108968     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.132.6.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  21 in total

1.  Focal fatty infiltration of the liver mimicking metastatic disease.

Authors:  Y Bashir
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Resection of liver metastases from a colorectal carcinoma does not benefit the patient.

Authors:  T M Hunt; N Carty; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Liver function tests in patients with computed tomography demonstrated hepatic metastases.

Authors:  M D Ottmar; R L Gonda; K J Leithauser; O H Gutierrez
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

Review 4.  Pre-operative evaluation of patients with low rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Durdey; N S Williams
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors.

Authors:  M Winkelmann; W D Schoppe; N Volk; K F Bürrig; R M Jungblut; W Schneider
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Focal liver lesions: a plan for management.

Authors:  J N Thompson; R Gibson; A Czerniak; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-01

7.  Accuracy of computerized tomography in determining hepatic tumor size in patients receiving liver transplantation or resection.

Authors:  R Mittal; C Kowal; T Starzl; D Van Thiel; K Bron; S Iwatsuki; R Schade; W Straub; A Dekker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Ultrasonography and computed tomography for diagnosis and follow-up of biliary duct rhabdomyosarcomas in children.

Authors:  A Geoffray; D Couanet; J P Montagne; J Leclère; F Flamant
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1987

9.  Preoperative imaging of liver metastases. Comparison of angiography, CT scan, and ultrasonography.

Authors:  P Gunvén; M Makuuchi; K Takayasu; N Moriyama; S Yamasaki; H Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  An analysis of imaging studies and liver function tests to detect hepatic neoplasia.

Authors:  T J McGarrity; T Samuels; F A Wilson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.