Literature DB >> 3901943

Preoperative imaging of liver metastases. Comparison of angiography, CT scan, and ultrasonography.

P Gunvén, M Makuuchi, K Takayasu, N Moriyama, S Yamasaki, H Hasegawa.   

Abstract

Thirty-one patients with mostly colorectal cancer metastases to the liver had preoperative selective/superselective angiograms (24 cases), computed tomography (CT) [26 cases, mostly enhanced by contrast administered by a peripheral vein (9), the common hepatic artery (9), or the portal vein (5)], and ultrasonography (26 cases). Intraoperative ultrasonography and palpation and examination of the resected specimens revealed 113 tumors. CT detected almost half of the masses smaller than 1 cm, and ultrasonography and angiography about one-third of lesions 1-2 cm in size. Ultrasonography was less powerful for examination of the posterior segment of the liver. CT and ultrasonography placed the tumors into subsegments more accurately than did angiography. Almost 40% of the preoperative plans had to be changed: in two-thirds by extended resections and in one-third by a change from curative to palliative intent. Most changes were due to extrahepatic tumor growth, often within areas screened before surgery. The use of all three imaging modalities for liver metastases is recommended for preoperative planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3901943      PMCID: PMC1250970          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198511000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography, and computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms.

Authors:  J H Snow; H M Goldstein; S Wallace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease.

Authors:  T J Smith; M M Kemeny; P H Sugarbaker; A E Jones; M Vermess; T H Shawker; B K Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A comparison of isotopic and computerized tomographic scanning in the diagnosis of metastasis to the liver in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  D F Temple; K L Parthasarathy; S P Bakshi; A E Mittelman
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-02

4.  Resection and embolization in the management of secondary hepatic tumors.

Authors:  L H Blumgart; D J Allison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Survival after liver resection for secondary tumors.

Authors:  J H Foster
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Major hepatic resection. A 25-year experience.

Authors:  H H Thompson; R K Tompkins; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  [Comparative study of ultrasonography and scintigraphy in liver metastases detection in cases of colorectal carcinoma (author's transl)].

Authors:  J P Arnaud; R Daly; A Leguillou; M Adloff
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1982-02

8.  Hepatic resection for secondary neoplasms.

Authors:  C E Morrow; T B Grage; D E Sutherland; J S Najarian
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M A Adson; J A van Heerden; M H Adson; J S Wagner; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-06

10.  Experience with 150 liver resections.

Authors:  S Iwatsuki; B W Shaw; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  11 in total

1.  Liver function tests in patients with computed tomography demonstrated hepatic metastases.

Authors:  M D Ottmar; R L Gonda; K J Leithauser; O H Gutierrez
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

2.  Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  S Blyth; A Blakeborough; M Peterson; I C Cameron; A W Majeed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Initial staging of non-small cell lung cancer: value of routine radioisotope bone scanning.

Authors:  F Michel; M Solèr; E Imhof; A P Perruchoud
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Diagnosis of liver metastases from malignant gastrointestinal neoplasms: results of pre- and intraoperative ultrasound examinations.

Authors:  A el Mouaaouy; M Naruhn; H D Becker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Accuracy of intraoperative ultrasonography in diagnosing liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: evaluation with postoperative follow-up results.

Authors:  J Machi; H Isomoto; T Kurohiji; Y Yamashita; K Shirouzu; T Kakegawa; B Sigel; H A Zaren; J Sariego
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Improved survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  G M Fuhrman; S A Curley; D C Hohn; M S Roh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Laparoscopy preferable to imaging procedures in detecting metastases of a pancreas carcinoma to the liver. Report of two cases.

Authors:  T Nishizaki; T Matsumata; E Adachi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Computed tomography of the brain, chest, and abdomen in the preoperative assessment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D Grant; D Edwards; P Goldstraw
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  P Soyer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Operative ultrasound establishes resectability of metastases by major hepatic resection.

Authors:  S T Brower; O Dumitrescu; S Rubinoff; J A McElhinney; A H Aufses
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.