Literature DB >> 6327930

Accuracy of computerized tomography in determining hepatic tumor size in patients receiving liver transplantation or resection.

R Mittal, C Kowal, T Starzl, D Van Thiel, K Bron, S Iwatsuki, R Schade, W Straub, A Dekker.   

Abstract

Computerized tomography (CT) of liver is used in oncologic practice for staging tumors, evaluating response to treatment, and screening patients for hepatic resection. Because of the impact of CT liver scan on major treatment decisions, it is important to assess its accuracy. Patients undergoing liver transplantation or resection provide a unique opportunity to test the accuracy of hepatic-imaging techniques by comparison of findings of preoperative CT scan with those at gross pathologic examination of resected specimens. Forty-one patients who had partial hepatic resection (34 patients) or liver transplantation (eight patients) for malignant (30 patients) or benign (11 patients) tumors were evaluable. Eight (47%) of 17 patients with primary malignant liver tumors, four (31%) of 13 patients with metastatic liver tumors, and two (20%) of 10 patients with benign liver tumors had tumor nodules in resected specimens that were not apparent on preoperative CT studies. These nodules varied in size from 0.1 to 1.6 cm. While 11 of 14 of these nodules were less than 1.0 cm, three of 14 were greater than 1.0 cm. These results suggest that conventional CT alone may be insufficient to accurately determine the presence or absence of liver metastases, extent of liver involvement, or response of hepatic metastases to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6327930      PMCID: PMC3154766          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.6.637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

1.  Radionuclide imaging, computed tomography, and gray-scale ultrasonography of the liver: a comparative study.

Authors:  Z D Grossman; B W Wistow; P J Bryan; W M Dinn; J G McAfee; S A Kieffer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Correlation of computed tomography, gray scale ultrasonography, and radionuclide imaging of the liver in detecting space-occupying processes.

Authors:  P J Bryan; W M Dinn; Z D Grossman; B W Wistow; J G McAfee; S A Kieffer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Transplantation of the liver.

Authors:  R Y Calne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J A Hanley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Surgical approaches for primary and metastatic liver neoplasms, including total hepatectomy with orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; L J Koep
Journal:  Prog Clin Cancer       Date:  1978

6.  Retrospective comparison of radionuclide scans and computed tomography of the liver and pancreas.

Authors:  R L MacCarty; H W Wahner; D H Stephens; P F Sheedy; R R Hattery
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Computed tomography and radionuclide imaging of the liver: a comparative evaluation.

Authors:  D R Biello; R G Levitt; B A Siegel; S S Sagel; R J Stanley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Infusion hepatic angiography in diagnosis of liver metastases.

Authors:  J Rösch; P Freeny; R Antonovic; O H Gutierrez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Further clinical studies with intrahepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  F J Ansfield; G Ramirez; H L Davis; G W Wirtanen; R O Johnson; G T Bryan; F B Manalo; E C Borden; T E Davis; M Esmili
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Survival after liver resection for secondary tumors.

Authors:  J H Foster
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma by ultrasonography, computed tomography, and angiography: the role of CT combined with arterial portography.

Authors:  F Garbagnati; C Spreafico; A Marchianò; M Salvetti; C Segura; G Piragine
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

2.  When should patients be referred for liver transplantation?

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-09-05

3.  Primary hepatocellular carcinoma--recent advances and future prospects.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-10

4.  Liver transplantation in the adult.

Authors:  R Y Calne; R Williams; K Rolles
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  [Extended resection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer].

Authors:  P Hohenberger; P Schlag; C Herfarth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1993

6.  Liver transplantation for malignant disease. Results in 93 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J G O'Grady; R J Polson; K Rolles; R Y Calne; R Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A High Circulating Tumor Cell Count in Portal Vein Predicts Liver Metastasis From Periampullary or Pancreatic Cancer: A High Portal Venous CTC Count Predicts Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Yu Wen Tien; Hsun-Chuan Kuo; Be-Ing Ho; Ming-Chu Chang; Yu-Ting Chang; Mei-Fang Cheng; Huai-Lu Chen; Ting-Yung Liang; Chien-Fang Wang; Chia-Yi Huang; Jin-Yuh Shew; Ying Chih Chang; Eva Yhp Lee; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.