Literature DB >> 3308375

An analysis of imaging studies and liver function tests to detect hepatic neoplasia.

T J McGarrity1, T Samuels, F A Wilson.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of scintigraphy, ultrasound, and CT scanning in conjunction with biochemical tests in the detection of liver neoplasia. Sixty-three patients with metastatic liver disease and 45 patients with nonmalignant liver disease received a total of 46 liver/spleen scans, 61 ultrasounds, and 49 CT scans. The sensitivities of liver/spleen scan, ultrasound, and CT scan were 72, 73, and 81%, respectively; the specificities were 86, 94, and 83%, respectively; and, the accuracies were 78, 84, and 82%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in specificity, sensitivity, or accuracy was seen between the three imaging studies. The serum alkaline phosphatase was significantly more accurate than total bilirubin and SGOT in detecting liver metastasis. However, 19 and 13% of the malignant and nonmalignant groups, respectively, had normal biochemical tests. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the imaging studies in the presence of an abnormal alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, or total bilirubin were not significantly different than in the presence of normal biochemical tests. These results suggest that other factors such as cost, reproducibility, and availability of skilled interpreters should be considered in the selection of imaging studies for the detection of neoplastic liver disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3308375     DOI: 10.1007/BF01300197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography, and computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms.

Authors:  J H Snow; H M Goldstein; S Wallace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease.

Authors:  T J Smith; M M Kemeny; P H Sugarbaker; A E Jones; M Vermess; T H Shawker; B K Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Comparison of radionuclide imaging and ultrasonography of the liver.

Authors:  M K Elyaderani; O F Gabriele
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Roentgenographic techniques for the diagnosis and management of liver tumors.

Authors:  M E Clouse
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Detection of metastatic liver disease. Use of liver scans and biochemical liver tests.

Authors:  M A Tempero; R J Petersen; R K Zetterman; H M Lemon; J Gurney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Preoperative scanning: evaluation for metastatic disease in carcinoma of the breast, lung, colon, bladder, and prostate.

Authors:  R V Smalley; L S Malmud; W G Ritchie
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  The relationship of computed tomography, gray-scale ultrasonography and radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of hepatic masses.

Authors:  J P Petasnick; P Ram; D A Turner; E W Fordham
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  An assessment of routine liver scanning in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  S N Wiener; S H Sachs
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1978-02

9.  Indications for liver and brain scans. Screening tests for patients with oat cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R E Wittes; S D Yeh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Utility of radionuclide liver/spleen scanning and serum enzyme level in detecting hepatic metastases from ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  F A Mettler; J H Christie; N E Crow; J F Garcia; J D Wicks; S A Bartow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  Liver function tests in patients with computed tomography demonstrated hepatic metastases.

Authors:  M D Ottmar; R L Gonda; K J Leithauser; O H Gutierrez
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

2.  The value of metastatic screening in early primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Barry; F Thornton; M Murphy; F Younis; R G Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.