Literature DB >> 10893592

A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection.

C K Naughton1, D C Miller, D E Mager, D K Ornstein, W J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several studies suggest that sextant transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate provides insufficient material to detect all clinically important prostate cancer, and obtaining more biopsy cores may improve the cancer detection rate. We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing 6 to 12 prostate biopsy cores to determine the impact on the cancer detection rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 244 men, including 71 (29%) black men, with a mean age plus or minus standard deviation of 65 +/- 8 years to undergo biopsy with 6 or 12 peripheral zone tissue cores. In our study subjects serum total prostate specific antigen (PSA) was between 2.5 and 20 ng./ml., and/or digital rectal examination was suspicious for cancer. All men completed a self-administered pre-biopsy and 2 post-biopsy questionnaires at 2 and 4 weeks. Cancer detection rates were compared in the groups and correlated with race, biopsy history, digital rectal examination findings, total PSA, transrectal ultrasound volume and PSA density, as determined by the formula, total PSA/transrectal ultrasound volume.
RESULTS: The cancer detection rate in the 6 and 12 core groups was almost identical (26% and 27%, p = 0.9). There was no significant difference in cancer detection in the 2 trial arms with respect to subject race, biopsy history, digital rectal examination findings, total PSA, transrectal ultrasound volume or PSA density. However, our study did not have the statistical power to rule out small differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall cancer detection rate is not materially increased by 12 core, peripheral zone biopsy in men in whom prostate cancer was mainly detected by screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  51 in total

1.  Infection: prostate biopsy-infection and prior fluoroquinolone exposure.

Authors:  Michael A Liss
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Knife or needles? A cohort analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy for men with low- or intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Christine M Fisher; Patricia Troncoso; David A Swanson; Mark F Munsell; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Shih-Fan Yeh; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Identifying prostate cancer and its clinical risk in asymptomatic men using machine learning of high dimensional peripheral blood flow cytometric natural killer cell subset phenotyping data.

Authors:  Simon P Hood; Georgina Cosma; A Graham Pockley; Gemma A Foulds; Catherine Johnson; Stephen Reeder; Stéphanie E McArdle; Masood A Khan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MR-compatible assistance system for punction in a high-field system: device and feasibility of transgluteal biopsies of the prostate gland.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Christopher Herzog; Katrin Eichler; Renate Hammerstingl; Andreas Lukoschek; Stefanie Guthmann; Bernd Gutmann; Uwe Joseph Schoepf; Phillip Costello; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men.

Authors:  Satoshi Anai; John Pendleton; Peter Wludyka; Christopher Williams; Leah Nelms; Curtis Pettaway; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Shady Nafie; Raj P Pal; John P Dormer; Masood A Khan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Magnetic resonance tomography-guided interventional procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schernthaner; T H Helbich; B J Fueger; M Margreiter; M Memarsadeghi; A Stiglbauer; H-G Linhart; A Doan; K Pinker; P Brader
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Reduced Rate of Repeated Prostate Biopsies Observed in ConfirmMDx Clinical Utility Field Study.

Authors:  Kirk J Wojno; Frank J Costa; Robert J Cornell; Jeffrey D Small; Erik Pasin; Wim Van Criekinge; Joseph W Bigley; Leander Van Neste
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.